Getting It Quite Wrong: Van Manen and Smith on Phenomenology

被引:87
作者
Zahavi, Dan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Philosophy, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
phenomenology; research strategies; methodology; theory development; research evaluation; qualitative; NEUROPHENOMENOLOGY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1177/1049732318817547
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Max van Manen and Jonathan Smith have recently had an exchange in Qualitative Health Research concerning their respective use of phenomenology. I welcome the attempt to get clearer on what phenomenology amounts to and I agree with van Manen that an overly arbitrary use of the term will lead to an erosion of the reputation of phenomenology. However, I think both of them are to blame for promoting various confusions concerning the nature of phenomenology. The aim of my article is to make some critical remarks concerning van Manen's and Smith's understanding of phenomenology and to suggest alternative resources for qualitative researchers interested in phenomenology.
引用
收藏
页码:900 / 907
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1982, IDEAS PERTAINING PUR
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1973, FORMALISM ETHICS NON
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, J PHENOMENOLOGICAL P, DOI DOI 10.1163/156916212X632934
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, PHILOS NURSING 5 QUE
  • [5] [Anonymous], PHENOMENOLOGICAL MIN
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1965, PHENOMENOLOGICAL MOV
  • [7] From Husserl to van Manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches
    Dowling, Maura
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2007, 44 (01) : 131 - 142
  • [8] Gallagher S, 2003, J CONSCIOUSNESS STUD, V10, P85
  • [9] Gallagher S., 1997, J CONSCIOUSNESS STUD, V4, P195
  • [10] Heidegger M., 1996, Being and Time