Language is an instrument for thought. Really?

被引：0

作者：

Nuyts, Jan ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Antwerp, Ctr Grammar Cognit & Typol, CST, Dept Linguist, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium

来源：

PRAGMATICS & COGNITION | 2012年 / 20卷 / 02期

关键词：

Cognition; communication; culture; functions of language; language and communication; language and thought; thinking; Whorfianism;

D O I：

10.1075/pc.20.2.07nuy

中图分类号：

H0 [语言学];

学科分类号：

030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;

摘要：

This discussion article addresses the assumption formulated in Dan Everett's new book Language: The Cultural Tool that language is not only an instrument for communication, but also an instrument for thought. It argues that the latter assumption is far from obvious, and that, in any case, one cannot put communication and thought on a par in discussing the functionality of language.

引用

页码：317 / 333

页数：17

共 27 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2002, International Journal of Cognition and Technology, DOI DOI 10.1075/IJCT.1.1.04DAS

[2]

[Anonymous], 1986, Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use

[3]

Chomsky Noam., 1975, REFLECTIONS LANGUAGE

[4]

Chomsky Noam., 1972, LANGUAGE MIND

[5]

Dascal M., 2003, INTERPRETATION UNDER

[6]

Everett D., 2012, Language: The cultural tool

[7]

Harman G., 1975, Language, Thought, and Communication, P270

[8]

Jackendoff R., 1987, CONSCIOUSNESS COMPUT

[9]

Katz Jerrold., 1981, LANGUAGE OTHER ABSTR

[10]

Levinson S., 2003, Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity

← 1 2 3 →