Ownership, Governance, Uses, and Ecosystem Services of Community Forests in the Eastern United States

被引:4
作者
Hovis, Meredith [1 ]
Frey, Gregory [2 ]
McGinley, Kathleen [3 ]
Cubbage, Frederick [4 ]
Han, Xue [5 ]
Lupek, Megan [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Udall Ctr Studies Publ Policy, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, Southern Res Stn, USDA, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[3] US Forest Serv, Int Inst Trop Forestry, USDA, Rio Piedras, PR 00926 USA
[4] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[5] Harbin Finance Univ, Dept Management, Harbin 150028, Peoples R China
来源
FORESTS | 2022年 / 13卷 / 10期
关键词
community forests; Eastern United States; recreation; ecosystem services; governance; public participation; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; DEFORESTATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/f13101577
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Over time, community forests (CFs) have been established across the globe to meet various social, economic, and ecological needs. Benefits of CFs include conserving resilient forests and natural resources and ecosystem services, enhancing social and economic capital, and leveraging local and indigenous knowledge in forest and natural resource management and decision-making. Research on CFs in the U.S. is quite limited, and cases that have been assessed show a wide spectrum in terms of CF ownership, organizational structure, governance, property rights, and uses. Through an exploratory research approach, this study enhances the understanding of the characteristics of CFs in the U.S. and the ecosystem services and other benefits that they provide. Through online web searches, we compiled one of the first comprehensive lists of CFs in the Eastern U.S. Prior to this study, there was no publicly available comprehensive database or list of CFs in the country. Subsequently, we conducted comparative case study research, which included semi-structured in-person interviews with key stakeholders from four CFs in the Eastern U.S. to understand CF ownership, governance, uses, and benefits. CFs benefits frequently included cultural services, such as recreation and education, and regulating and supporting services, such as water quality and wildlife habitat. Much less common was a focus on provisioning services such as timber or non-timber forest products. Maintaining collaboration and funding for CF efforts in the long run without significant CF revenues remains a challenge for most forests. Overall, this research sheds lights on CF characteristics and capacities in the Eastern U.S. and identifies potential opportunities and needs for the U.S. in the future. CFs researchers, managers, and community members.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] RATIONAL DETERRENCE THEORY AND COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIES
    ACHEN, CH
    SNIDAL, D
    [J]. WORLD POLITICS, 1989, 41 (02) : 143 - 169
  • [2] Editorial overview: Forest governance interventions for sustainability through information, incentives, and institutions
    Agrawal, Arun
    Hajjar, Reem
    Liao, Chuan
    Rasmussen, Laura Vang
    Watkins, Cristy
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 32 : A1 - A7
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1978, 7 FAO
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, US FED REG 230 2
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2022, U.S. Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters, P2022, DOI DOI 10.25921/STKW-7W73
  • [6] Belsky JillM., 2008, Forest Community Connections: Implications for Research, Management, and Governance
  • [7] What benefits do community forests provide, and to whom? A rapid assessment of ecosystem services from a Himalayan forest, Nepal
    Birch, Jennifer C.
    Thapa, Ishana
    Balmford, Andrew
    Bradbury, Richard B.
    Brown, Claire
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    Gurung, Hum
    Hughes, Francine M. R.
    Mulligan, Mark
    Pandeya, Bhopal
    Peh, Kelvin S-H.
    Stattersfield, Alison J.
    Walpole, Matt
    Thomas, David H. L.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 8 : 118 - 127
  • [8] Brown W.A., 2016, JOSSEY BASS HDB NONP, P217
  • [9] Bullock R., 2017, GROWING COMMUNITY FO
  • [10] Bullock R., 2014, WORKSHOP S REPORT