The influence of surface treatment on the implant roughness pattern

被引:64
|
作者
Rosa, Marcio Borges [1 ]
Albrektsson, Tomas [2 ]
Francischone, Carlos Eduardo [1 ]
Schwartz Filho, Humberto Osvaldo [3 ]
Wennerberg, Ann [4 ]
机构
[1] Sao Leopoldo Mandic Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Postgrad, Div Implantol, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[2] Gothenburg Univ, Dept Biomat, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Santo Amaro UNISA, Sch Dent, Div Implantol, Dept Postgrad, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Malmo Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Malmo, Sweden
关键词
Surface treatments; Blasting; Acid etched; Dental implants; Osseointegration; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; REMOVAL TORQUE; PART; BONE; TOPOGRAPHY; OSSEOINTEGRATION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1590/S1678-77572012000500010
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
An important parameter for the clinical success of dental implants is the formation of direct contact between the implant and surrounding bone, whose quality is directly influenced by the implant surface roughness. A screw-shaped design and a surface with an average roughness of Sa of 1-2 mu m showed a better result. The combination of blasting and etching has been a commonly used surface treatment technique. The versatility of this type of treatment allows for a wide variation in the procedures in order to obtain the desired roughness. Objectives: To compare the roughness values and morphological characteristics of 04 brands of implants, using the same type of surface treatment. In addition, to compare the results among brands, in order to assess whether the type of treatment determines the values and the characteristics of implant surface roughness. Material and methods: Three implants were purchased directly from each selected company in the market, i.e., 03 Brazilian companies (Biomet 3i of Brazil, Neodent and Titaniumfix) and 01 Korean company (Oneplant). The quantitative or numerical characterization of the roughness was performed using an interferometer. The qualitative analysis of the surface topography obtained with the treatment was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy images. Results: The evaluated implants showed a significant variation in roughness values: Sa for Oneplant was 1.01 mu m; Titaniumfix reached 0.90 mu m; implants from Neodent 0.67 mu m, and Biomet 3i of Brazil 0.53 mu m. Moreover, the SEM images showed very different patterns for the surfaces examined. Conclusions: The surface treatment alone is not able to determine the roughness values and characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 555
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Retrospective Evaluation of the Influence of the Collar Surface Topography on Peri-implant Bone Preservation
    Mendonca, Jose Alfredo
    Senna, Plinio Mendes
    Francischone, Carlos Eduardo
    Francischone Junior, Carlos Eduardo
    de Souza Picorelli Assis, Neuza Maria
    Sotto-Maior, Bruno Salles
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (04) : 858 - 863
  • [22] Effects of Oral Implant Surface Roughness on Bacterial Biofilm Formation and Treatment Efficacy
    Lin, Hai Yan
    Liu, Yuelian
    Wismeijer, Daniel
    Crielaard, Wim
    Deng, Dong Mei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (05) : 1226 - 1231
  • [23] The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration
    Abuhussein, Heba
    Pagni, Giorgio
    Rebaudi, Alberto
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (02) : 129 - 136
  • [24] Does implant surface hydrophilicity influence the maintenance of surface integrity after insertion into low-density artificial bone?
    Ferreira Silva, Gabrielle Alencar
    Faot, Fernanda
    da Silva, Wander Jose
    Del Bel Cury, Altair Antoninha
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2021, 37 (02) : E69 - E84
  • [25] Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study
    Tabassum, Afsheen
    Meijer, Gert J.
    Wolke, Johannes G. C.
    Jansen, John A.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (02) : 213 - 220
  • [26] Thermal oxidation and hydrofluoric acid treatment on the sandblasted implant surface: A histologic histomorphometric and biomechanical study
    Qamheya, Ala Hassan A.
    Arisan, Volkan
    Mutlu, Zihni
    Karabagli, Murat
    Tekkesin, Merva Soluk
    Kara, Kamuran
    Erol, Ayse
    Ersanli, Selim
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (07) : 741 - 755
  • [27] Zirconia Implant with Rough Surface Produced by YAG Laser Treatment: Evaluation of Histomorphology and Strength of Osseointegration
    Kakura, Kae
    Yasuno, Kimie
    Taniguchi, Yusuke
    Yamamoto, Kazuko
    Sakai, Takuya
    Irie, Akihito
    Kido, Hirofumi
    JOURNAL OF HARD TISSUE BIOLOGY, 2014, 23 (01) : 77 - 82
  • [28] Improving the Surface Roughness of Dental Implant Fixture by Considering the Size, Angle and Spraying Pressure of Sandblast Particles
    Ehsan Anbarzadeh
    Bijan Mohammadi
    Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2024, 21 : 303 - 324
  • [29] Implant surface roughness and patient factors on long-term peri-implant bone loss
    De Bruyn, Hugo
    Christiaens, Veronique
    Doornewaard, Ron
    Jacobsson, Magnus
    Cosyn, Jan
    Jacquet, Wolfgang
    Vervaeke, Stijn
    PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2017, 73 (01) : 218 - 227
  • [30] Zirconia Implants with Laser Surface Treatment: Peri-Implant Bone Response and Enhancement of Osseointegration
    Yasuno, Kimie
    Kakura, Kae
    Taniguchi, Yusuke
    Yamaguchi, Yuichiro
    Kido, Hirofumi
    JOURNAL OF HARD TISSUE BIOLOGY, 2014, 23 (01) : 93 - 100