Robotic surgical staging for obese patients with endometrial cancer

被引:33
作者
Tang, Karen Y. [1 ]
Gardiner, Stuart K. [2 ]
Gould, Claire [1 ]
Osmundsen, Blake [1 ]
Collins, Michael [1 ]
Winter, William E., III [3 ]
机构
[1] Legacy Hlth Syst, Dept Gynecol, Portland, OR USA
[2] Legacy Hlth Syst, Devers Eye Inst, Portland, OR USA
[3] Compass Oncol, Portland, OR USA
关键词
endometrial cancer; obesity; robotic surgery; ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; TOTAL ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; VAGINAL CUFF DEHISCENCE; WOMEN; LAPAROTOMY; OUTCOMES; RISK; LYMPHADENECTOMY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical outcomes for robotic vs laparotomy staging in obese endometrial cancer patients. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with body mass index >= 30 kg/m(2) staged in a community gynecologic oncology practice. Patients undergoing robotic staging were compared with historic laparotomy controls. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine patients underwent robotic staging, compared with 110 laparotomy patients. The robotic cohort had fewer abdominal wound complications (13.9% vs 32.7%, P < .001), but more vaginal cuff complications (4.7% vs 0%, P = .032). Blood loss was lower in the robotic group (P < .001), as was length of stay (P < .001). Surgical times were longer in the robotic group (P < .001). There was no difference in terms of percentage of patients undergoing pelvic or paraaortic lymph node dissection. CONCLUSION: Robotic staging for endometrial cancer is feasible in obese women, with fewer abdominal wound complications, but more vaginal cuff complications.
引用
收藏
页码:513.e1 / 513.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques [J].
Bell, Maria C. ;
Torgerson, Jenny ;
Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha ;
Suttle, Allison Wierda ;
Hunt, Sharon .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 111 (03) :407-411
[2]  
BOGGESS JF, 2008, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V199
[3]   Survival outcomes for women with uterine malignancy undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic staging procedures [J].
Brudie, L. ;
Backes, F. ;
Ahmad, S. ;
Finkler, N. ;
Bigsby, G. ;
Cohn, D. ;
O'Malley, D. ;
Farrell, M. ;
Fowler, J. ;
Holloway, R. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (01) :S95-S95
[4]   Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer [J].
DeNardis, Sara A. ;
Holloway, Robert W. ;
Bigsby, Glenn E. ;
Pikaart, Dirk P. ;
Ahmad, Sarfraz ;
Finkler, Neil J. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 111 (03) :412-417
[5]   Comparing surgical outcomes in obese women undergoing laparotomy, laparoscopy, or laparotomy with panniculectomy for the staging of uterine malignancy [J].
Eisenhauer, Eric L. ;
Wypych, Kelly A. ;
Mehrara, Babak J. ;
Lawson, Carrie ;
Chi, Dennis S. ;
Barakat, Richard R. ;
Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (08) :2384-2391
[6]   Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: Laparoscopy or laparotomy? [J].
Eltabbakh, GH ;
Shamonki, MI ;
Moody, JM ;
Garafano, LL .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2000, 78 (03) :329-335
[7]   Endometrial cancer and obesity: Epidemiology, biomarkers, prevention and survivorship [J].
Fader, Amanda Nickles ;
Arriba, Lucybeth Nieves ;
Frasure, Heidi E. ;
von Gruenigen, Vivian E. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 114 (01) :121-127
[8]   Cancer statistics, 2000 [J].
Greenlee, RT ;
Murray, T ;
Bolden, S ;
Wingo, PA .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2000, 50 (01) :7-33
[9]  
Hernandez E, 2006, OBSTET GYNECOL, V107, P952, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000209463.53764.e7
[10]   The impact of robotics on practice management of endometrial cancer: transitioning from traditional surgery [J].
Hoekstra, Anna V. ;
Jairam-Thodla, Arati ;
Rademaker, Alfred ;
Singh, Diljeet K. ;
Buttin, Barbara M. ;
Lurain, John R. ;
Schink, Julian C. ;
Lowe, M. Patrick .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2009, 5 (04) :392-397