共 50 条
PGE2 promotes breast cancer-associated lymphangiogenesis by activation of EP4 receptor on lymphatic endothelial cells
被引:61
|作者:
Nandi, Pinki
[1
]
Girish, Gannareddy V.
[1
]
Majumder, Mousumi
[1
,4
]
Xin, Xiping
[1
]
Tutunea-Fatan, Elena
[1
]
Lala, Peeyush K.
[1
,2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Oncol, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Childrens Hlth Res Inst, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
[4] Brandon Univ, Dept Biol, Brandon, MB R7A 6A9, Canada
来源:
BMC CANCER
|
2017年
/
17卷
基金:
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词:
PGE2;
Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2;
Lymphangiogenesis;
Angiognesis;
EP4;
receptors;
antagonist;
Breast cancer;
Metastasis;
Lymphatic endothelial cells;
Directed in vivo lymphangiogenesis assay (DIVLA);
INDOMETHACIN THERAPY;
COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA;
TUMOR PROGRESSION;
PROSTAGLANDIN E-2;
NODE METASTASES;
UP-REGULATION;
ANGIOGENESIS;
COX-2;
INHIBITORS;
MURINE;
D O I:
10.1186/s12885-016-3018-2
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background: Lymphatic metastasis, facilitated by lymphangiogenesis is a common occurrence in breast cancer, the molecular mechanisms remaining incompletely understood. We had earlier shown that cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression by human or murine breast cancer cells promoted lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis by upregulating VEGF-C/D production by tumor cells or tumor-associated macrophages primarily due to activation of the prostaglandin receptor EP4 by endogenous PGE2. It is not clear whether tumor or host-derived PGE2 has any direct effect on lymphangiogenesis, and if so, whether EP4 receptors on lymphatic endothelial cells (LEC) play any role. Methods: Here, we address these questions employing in vitro studies with a COX-2-expressing and VEGF-C/D-producing murine breast cancer cell line C3L5 and a rat mesenteric (RM) LEC line and in vivo studies in nude mice. Results: RMLEC responded to PGE2, an EP4 agonist PGE1OH, or C3L5 cell-conditioned media (C3L5-CM) by increased proliferation, migration and accelerated tube formation on growth factor reduced Matrigel. Native tube formation by RMLEC on Matrigel was abrogated in the presence of a selective COX-2 inhibitor or an EP4 antagonist. Addition of PGE2 or EP4 agonist, or C3L5-CM individually in the presence of COX-2 inhibitor, or EP4 antagonist, restored tube formation, reinforcing the role of EP4 on RMLEC in tubulogenesis. These results were partially duplicated with a human dermal LEC (HMVEC-dLyAd) and a COX-2 expressing human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. Knocking down EP4 with shRNA in RMLEC abrogated their tube forming capacity on Matrigel in the absence or presence of PGE2, EP4 agonist, or C3L5-CM. RMLEC tubulogenesis following EP4 activation by agonist treatment was dependent on PI3K/Akt and Erk signaling pathways and VEGFR-3 stimulation. Finally in a directed in vivo lymphangiogenesis assay (DIVLA) we demonstrated the lymphangiogenic as well as angiogenic capacity of PGE2 and EP4 agonist in vivo. Discussion/conclusions: These results demonstrate the roles of tumor as well as host-derived PGE2 in inducing lymphangiogenesis, at least in part, by activating EP4 and VEGFR-3 on LEC. EP4 being a common target on both tumor and host cells contributing to tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis reaffirms the therapeutic value of EP4 antagonists in the intervention of lymphatic metastasis in breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文