Measuring strategies for learning regulation in medical education: Scale reliability and dimensionality in a Swedish sample

被引:10
作者
Edelbring, Samuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept LIME, Ctr Med Educ, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Regulation strategies; Self-regulated learning; Approaches to studying; Validation; STUDENTS; INVENTORY; PATTERNS; STYLES;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6920-12-76
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: The degree of learners' self-regulated learning and dependence on external regulation influence learning processes in higher education. These regulation strategies are commonly measured by questionnaires developed in other settings than in which they are being used, thereby requiring renewed validation. The aim of this study was to psychometrically evaluate the learning regulation strategy scales from the Inventory of Learning Styles with Swedish medical students (N = 206). Methods: The regulation scales were evaluated regarding their reliability, scale dimensionality and interrelations. The primary evaluation focused on dimensionality and was performed with Mokken scale analysis. To assist future scale refinement, additional item analysis, such as item-to-scale correlations, was performed. Results: Scale scores in the Swedish sample displayed good reliability in relation to published results: Cronbach's alpha: 0.82, 0.72, and 0.65 for self-regulation, external regulation and lack of regulation scales respectively. The dimensionalities in scales were adequate for self-regulation and its subscales, whereas external regulation and lack of regulation displayed less unidimensionality. The established theoretical scales were largely replicated in the exploratory analysis. The item analysis identified two items that contributed little to their respective scales. Discussion: The results indicate that these scales have an adequate capacity for detecting the three theoretically proposed learning regulation strategies in the medical education sample. Further construct validity should be sought by interpreting scale scores in relation to specific learning activities. Using established scales for measuring students' regulation strategies enables a broad empirical base for increasing knowledge on regulation strategies in relation to different disciplinary settings and contributes to theoretical development.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   Andragogy and medical education: Are medical students internally motivated to learn? [J].
Misch, DA .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2002, 7 (02) :153-160
[22]   The development of study orientations and study success in students of pharmacy [J].
Nieminen, J ;
Lindblom-Ylänne, S ;
Lonka, K .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2004, 32 (05) :387-417
[23]  
R Development Core Team, 2011, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
[24]  
Richardson J.T. E., 2000, RES STUDENT LEARNING
[25]   Methodological issues in questionnaire-based research on student learning in higher education [J].
Richardson, JTE .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2004, 16 (04) :347-358
[26]   Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha [J].
Schmitt, N .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1996, 8 (04) :350-353
[27]   The potential of the inventory of learning styles to study students' learning patterns in three types of medical curricula [J].
Van der Veken, J. ;
Valcke, M. ;
Muijtjens, A. ;
De Maeseneer, J. ;
Derese, A. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2008, 30 (9-10) :863-869
[28]   Mokken scale analysis: Between the Guttman scale and parametric item response theory [J].
van Schuur, WH .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2003, 11 (02) :139-163
[29]   Disciplinary differences in self-regulated learning in college students [J].
VanderStoep, SW ;
Pintrich, PR ;
Fagerlin, A .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 21 (04) :345-362
[30]   Congruence and friction between learning and teaching [J].
Vermunt, JD ;
Verloop, N .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 1999, 9 (03) :257-280