Measuring strategies for learning regulation in medical education: Scale reliability and dimensionality in a Swedish sample

被引:10
作者
Edelbring, Samuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept LIME, Ctr Med Educ, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Regulation strategies; Self-regulated learning; Approaches to studying; Validation; STUDENTS; INVENTORY; PATTERNS; STYLES;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6920-12-76
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: The degree of learners' self-regulated learning and dependence on external regulation influence learning processes in higher education. These regulation strategies are commonly measured by questionnaires developed in other settings than in which they are being used, thereby requiring renewed validation. The aim of this study was to psychometrically evaluate the learning regulation strategy scales from the Inventory of Learning Styles with Swedish medical students (N = 206). Methods: The regulation scales were evaluated regarding their reliability, scale dimensionality and interrelations. The primary evaluation focused on dimensionality and was performed with Mokken scale analysis. To assist future scale refinement, additional item analysis, such as item-to-scale correlations, was performed. Results: Scale scores in the Swedish sample displayed good reliability in relation to published results: Cronbach's alpha: 0.82, 0.72, and 0.65 for self-regulation, external regulation and lack of regulation scales respectively. The dimensionalities in scales were adequate for self-regulation and its subscales, whereas external regulation and lack of regulation displayed less unidimensionality. The established theoretical scales were largely replicated in the exploratory analysis. The item analysis identified two items that contributed little to their respective scales. Discussion: The results indicate that these scales have an adequate capacity for detecting the three theoretically proposed learning regulation strategies in the medical education sample. Further construct validity should be sought by interpreting scale scores in relation to specific learning activities. Using established scales for measuring students' regulation strategies enables a broad empirical base for increasing knowledge on regulation strategies in relation to different disciplinary settings and contributes to theoretical development.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HDB MODERN ITEM RESP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, J STAT SOFTW, DOI [10.18637/jss.v020.i11, DOI 10.18637/JSS.V020.I11]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412984676
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1975, J CONTIN EDUC NURS
[5]   Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students [J].
Boekaerts, M .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 1997, 7 (02) :161-186
[6]  
Boekaerts M., 1999, International Journal of Educational Research, V31, P445, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2
[7]   Learning styles and academic outcome: The validity and utility of Vermunt's Inventory of Learning Styles in a British higher education setting [J].
Boyle, EA ;
Duffy, T ;
Dunleavy, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 73 :267-290
[8]   The application of Item Response Theory on a teaching strategy profile questionnaire [J].
Brodin, Ulf ;
Fors, Uno ;
Laksov, Klara B. .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 10
[9]   A reflective analysis of medical education research on self-regulation in learning and practice [J].
Brydges, Ryan ;
Butler, Deborah .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 46 (01) :71-79
[10]   WHAT IS COEFFICIENT ALPHA - AN EXAMINATION OF THEORY AND APPLICATIONS [J].
CORTINA, JM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (01) :98-104