Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement

被引:37
作者
Hendriksma, Martine [1 ]
Joosten, Michiel H. M. A. [1 ]
Peters, Jeroen P. M. [1 ,2 ]
Grolman, Wilko [1 ,2 ]
Stegeman, Inge [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Otorhinolaryngol & Head & Neck Surg, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Brain Ctr Rudolf Magnus, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; CONTROLLED-TRIALS; CONSORT; IMPLEMENTATION; COMPLETENESS; SPONSORSHIP; GUIDELINES; ABSTRACTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0169316
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Observational studies are the most frequently published studies in literature. When randomized controlled trials cannot be conducted because of ethical or practical considerations, an observational study design is the first choice. The STROBE Statement (STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology) was developed to provide guidance on how to adequately report observational studies. Objectives The objectives were 1) to evaluate the quality of reporting of observational studies of otorhinolaryngologic literature using the STROBE Statement checklist, 2) to compare the quality of reporting of observational studies in the top 5 Ear, Nose, Throat (ENT) journals versus the top 5 general medical journals and 3) to formulate recommendations to improve adequate reporting of observational research in otorhinolaryngologic literature. Methods The top 5 general medical journals and top 5 otorhinolaryngologic journals were selected based on their ISI Web of Knowledge impact factors. On August 3rd, 2015, we performed a PubMed search using different filters to retrieve observational articles from these journals. Studies were selected from 2010 to 2014 for the general medical journals and from 2015 for the ENT journals. We assessed all STROBE items to examine how many items were reported adequately for each journal type. Results The articles in the top 5 general medical journals (n = 11) reported a mean of 69.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 65.8%-72.7%; median 70.6%), whereas the top 5 ENT journals (n = 29) reported a mean of 51.4% (95% CI: 47.7%-55.0%; median 50.0%). The two journal types reported STROBE items significantly different (p < .001). Conclusion Quality of reporting of observational studies in otorhinolaryngologic articles can considerably enhance. The quality of reporting was better in general medical journals compared to ENT journals. To improve the quality of reporting of observational studies, we recommend authors and editors to endorse and actively implement the STROBE Statement.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Reporting Quality of Observational Studies in Plastic Surgery Needs Improvement: A Systematic Review [J].
Agha, Riaz Ahmed ;
Lee, Seon-Young ;
Jeong, Kyung Jin Lee ;
Fowler, Alexander J. ;
Orgill, Dennis P. .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 76 (05) :585-589
[2]  
Altman, 1999, PRACTICAL STAT MED R
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Can Med Assoc J, V121, P1193
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, STROBE STATEMENT STR
[5]   Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research - A systematic review [J].
Bekelman, JE ;
Li, Y ;
Gross, CP .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (04) :454-465
[6]   A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. [J].
Benson, K ;
Hartz, AJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (25) :1878-1886
[7]  
Black N, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P1215
[8]   Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. [J].
Concato, J ;
Shah, N ;
Horwitz, RI .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (25) :1887-1892
[9]   A systematic assessment of the quality of reporting for platelet transfusion studies [J].
Delaney, Meghan ;
Meyer, Erin ;
Cserti-Gazdewich, Christine ;
Haspel, Richard L. ;
Lin, Yulia ;
Morris, Anna ;
Pavenski, Katerina ;
Dzik, Walter H. ;
Murphy, Mike ;
Slichter, Sherrill ;
Wang, Grace ;
Dumont, Larry J. ;
Heddle, Nancy .
TRANSFUSION, 2010, 50 (10) :2135-2144
[10]   A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics [J].
Fleming, Padhraig S. ;
Seehra, Jadbinder ;
Polychronopoulou, Argy ;
Fedorowicz, Zbys ;
Pandis, Nikolaos .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2013, 83 (01) :158-163