A novel evaluation method of gastric mucoadhesive property in vitro and the mucoadhesive mechanism of tetracycline-sucralfate acidic complex for eradication of Helicobacter pylori

被引:9
作者
Higo, S
Ori, K
Takeuchi, H
Yamamoto, H
Hino, T
Kawashima, Y
机构
[1] Chugai Pharmaceut Co Ltd, Prod Res Dept, Shizuoka 4128513, Japan
[2] Gifu Pharmaceut Univ, Dept Pharmaceut Engn, Gifu 5020003, Japan
关键词
complex; Helicobacter pylori; mucoadhesion; sucralfate; tetracycline;
D O I
10.1023/B:PHAM.0000019293.57927.7f
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Purpose. The gastric mucoadhesive property of tetracycline-sucralfate acidic complex (CO) was evaluated by using a novel method in vitro to compare with the in vivo test. The mucoadhesive mechanism of the acidic complex was also studied. Methods. The gastric mucosa removed from a rat was placed covering the end of a plunger and secured in a disposable syringe. The acidic test medium was gradually infused in and then flowed out. Two different kinds of CO, tetracycline, or a physical mixture (PM) were introduced into the device to compare their mucoadhesive properties. The tetracycline content in the residue on the mucosa was measured. The results were compared with those of the in vivo test. The acidic response of CO and the protein binding capacity of a sucrose octasulfate group (SOS) in sucralfate or CO were evaluated. Results. The mucoadhesive properties of CO were clearly superior to those of PM. The remaining amounts of tetracycline in each test sample, determined by the in vitro test, were in agreement with those of the in vivo test. The excellent mucoadhesive property of CO appeared to be caused by the rapid response to the acid and resulting mucoadhesive gel formation. Furthermore, the binding capacity of SOS to the protein was clearly greater than that of PM. The excessive acid treatment during the preparation of CO tended to decrease the mucoadhesive property. Conclusions. CO appeared to be potentially useful for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori because of the direct delivery of tetracycline to the gastric mucosa for an extended period of time.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 419
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Attama AA, 2000, CHEM PHARM BULL, V48, P734, DOI 10.1248/cpb.48.734
[2]   In-vitro bioadhesion of carbopol hydrogels [J].
BlancoFuente, H ;
AnguianoIgea, S ;
OteroEspinar, FJ ;
BlancoMendez, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 1996, 142 (02) :169-174
[3]   OROPHARYNGEAL DECONTAMINATION - BIOADHESIVE POWDER MIXTURE FORMULATION .1. CHOICE OF THE BIOADHESIVE MATERIAL [J].
CHARRUEAU, C ;
ARNAUD, P ;
DURIEUX, J ;
ALLAIN, P ;
CHAUMEIL, JC .
JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 1993, 26 (01) :49-57
[4]   BIOADHESIVE POLYMERS AS PLATFORMS FOR ORAL CONTROLLED DRUG DELIVERY .2. SYNTHESIS AND EVALUATION OF SOME SWELLING, WATER-INSOLUBLE BIOADHESIVE POLYMERS [J].
CHNG, HS ;
PARK, H ;
KELLY, P ;
ROBINSON, JR .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1985, 74 (04) :399-405
[5]   Stomach-specific anti-H-pylori therapy.: 1:: preparation and characterization of tetracyline-loaded chitosan microspheres [J].
Hejazi, R ;
Amiji, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2002, 235 (1-2) :87-94
[6]  
Hoshino Y., 1984, Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi, V25, P430
[7]   ASSESSMENT OF AN INVITRO METHOD FOR MEASURING THE BIOADHESIVENESS OF TABLETS [J].
JIMENEZCASTELLANOS, MR ;
ZIA, H ;
RHODES, CT .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 1993, 89 (03) :223-228
[8]  
Katayama H, 1999, BIOL PHARM BULL, V22, P55
[9]   Development and evaluation of a mucoadhesive drug delivery system for dual-controlled delivery of nonoxynol-9 [J].
Lee, CH ;
Chien, YW .
JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 1996, 39 (01) :93-103
[10]  
Lind T, 1996, Helicobacter, V1, P138, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-5378.1996.tb00027.x