When Life-Sustaining Treatment Is Withdrawn and the Patient Doesn't Die

被引:12
作者
Kutzsche, Stefan [1 ]
Partridge, John Colin [2 ]
Leuthner, Steven R. [3 ]
Lantos, John D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Univ Hosp Ulleval, Dept Neonatol, Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Pediat, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Pediat & Bioeth, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[4] Childrens Mercy Hosp, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
关键词
Ethics; palliative care; withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment; prognostication;
D O I
10.1542/peds.2013-0413
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
One of the most difficult decisions that doctors and parents must make is the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. Doctors find it easier to withdraw treatments in situations where withdrawal will be rapidly fatal rather than in situations in which treatment withdrawal will lead to a prolonged dying process. Mechanical ventilation is usually such a treatment. Withdrawal of ventilation generally leads to the patient's rapid demise. Doctors may tell parents that death will occur quickly after a ventilator is withdrawn. But what happens when the doctors are wrong and a patient survives without life support? What should doctors do next? We present a case in which that happened and asked 3 experts to comment on the case. Stefan Kutzsche is a senior consultant in neonatology at Oslo University Hospital Ulleval in Norway. John Colin Partridge is a neonatologist and professor of pediatrics at University of California, San Francisco. Steven R. Leuthner is a neonatologist and professor of pediatrics and bioethics at the Medical College of Wisconsin. They each recommend slightly different approaches to this dilemma.
引用
收藏
页码:893 / 897
页数:5
相关论文
共 4 条