Occupational physical activity and risk for breast cancer in a nationwide cohort study in Sweden

被引:34
作者
Moradi, T
Adami, HO
Bergström, R
Gridley, G
Wolk, A
Gerhardsson, M
Dosemeci, M
Nyrén, O
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] NCI, Div Epidemiol & Genet, Rockville, MD USA
[3] Astro Draco AB, Clin Drug Safety & Epidemiol, Lund, Sweden
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Canc Prevent, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Uppsala Univ, Dept Stat, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
breast cancer; physical activity;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008922205665
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Our purpose was to investigate effects of physical activity on risk for breast cancer. Methods: From the Swedish nationwide censuses in 1960 and 1970 we defined three partly overlapping cohorts of women whose occupational titles allowed reproducible classification of physical demands at work in 1960 (n=704,904), in 1970 (n=982,270), or with the same demands in both 1960 and 1970 (n=253,336). The incidence of breast cancer during 1971-89 was ascertained through record linkage to the Swedish Cancer Register. We used Poisson regression to estimate relative risks (RR). Results: A total of 20,419, 22,840, and 8261 breast cancers, respectively, were detected in the three cohorts. In all three cohorts the risk for breast cancer increased monotonically with decreasing level of occupational physical activity and with increasing socioeconomic status. Among women with the same estimated physical activity level in 1960 and 1970 the RR was 1.3 for sedentary as compared with high/very high activity level (95% CI 1.2-1.4; p for trend < 0.001). Adjustment for socioeconomic status virtually eliminated this association (RR 1.1; 95% CI 0.9-1.2; p for trend 0.12) leaving a statistically significant 30% gradient only among women aged 50-59 years at follow-up. The association between socioeconomic status and breast cancer risk was largely unchanged after adjustment for occupational physical activity. Conclusion: The protective effect of occupational physical activity on breast cancer risk, if any, appears to be confined to certain age groups.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 430
页数:8
相关论文
共 59 条
[11]   Physical activity and breast cancer: Is there a link? [J].
Dorgan, JF .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (15) :1116-1117
[12]   PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY AND RISK OF BREAST-CANCER IN THE FRAMINGHAM HEART-STUDY [J].
DORGAN, JF ;
BROWN, C ;
BARRETT, M ;
SPLANSKY, GL ;
KREGER, BE ;
DAGOSTINO, RB ;
ALBANES, D ;
SCHATZKIN, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 139 (07) :662-669
[13]   OCCUPATIONAL PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY, SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS, AND RISKS OF 15 CANCER SITES IN TURKEY [J].
DOSEMECI, M ;
HAYES, RB ;
VETTER, R ;
HOOVER, RN ;
TUCKER, M ;
ENGIN, K ;
UNSAL, M ;
BLAIR, A .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 1993, 4 (04) :313-321
[14]   MODERATE RECREATIONAL RUNNING IS ASSOCIATED WITH LOWERED SALIVARY PROGESTERONE PROFILES IN WOMEN [J].
ELLISON, PT ;
LAGER, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1986, 154 (05) :1000-1003
[15]   PERIPHERAL AROMATIZATION AS A RISK FACTOR FOR BREAST AND ENDOMETRIAL CANCER IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN - A REVIEW [J].
ENRIORI, CL ;
REFORZOMEMBRIVES, J .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1984, 17 (01) :1-21
[16]   PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY AND RISK OF BREAST-CANCER [J].
FRIEDENREICH, CM ;
ROHAN, TE .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 1995, 4 (02) :145-151
[17]   LOWER LIFETIME OCCURRENCE OF BREAST-CANCER AND CANCERS OF THE REPRODUCTIVE-SYSTEM AMONG FORMER COLLEGE ATHLETES [J].
FRISCH, RE ;
WYSHAK, G ;
ALBRIGHT, NL ;
ALBRIGHT, TE ;
SCHIFF, I ;
WITSCHI, J ;
MARGUGLIO, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1987, 45 (01) :328-335
[18]  
Gammon MD, 1998, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V147, P273
[19]  
GARNFINKEL L, 1988, CANCER, V62, P1844
[20]   A LARGE-SCALE, HOSPITAL-BASED CASE-CENTRAL STUDY OF RISK-FACTORS OF BREAST-CANCER ACCORDING TO MENOPAUSAL STATUS [J].
HIROSE, K ;
TAJIMA, K ;
HAMAJIMA, N ;
INOUE, M ;
TAKEZAKI, T ;
KUROISHI, T ;
YOSHIDA, M ;
TOKUDOME, S .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 1995, 86 (02) :146-154