Key factors in small group improvement work: an empirical study at SKF

被引:5
作者
Magnusson, Mats G. [1 ,2 ]
Vinciguerra, Emanuele [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Technol Management & Econ, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Luiss Guido Carli Univ, Dept Econ & Management, Rome, Italy
[3] SKF Sverige AB, SE-41550 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
continuous improvement; kaizen; TPM; total productive maintenance; improvement group; motivation; teamwork; communication;
D O I
10.1504/IJTM.2008.021042
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A common approach in continuous improvement programmes in manufacturing firms is that the bulk of the improvement activities is performed by small groups of shop-floor operators. The performance of these groups consequently is of great importance for the overall success of continuous improvement initiatives. Earlier research has among other things pointed out the importance of motivation, communication and leadership support for the work of these groups. However, there is still a lack of empirical studies of these factors in terms of their relative impact on performance and their inter-relationships. This paper addresses these issues based on an investigation of small improvement groups at three SKF factories in Sweden. Based on a combination of participatory studies, interviews and a survey to the leaders of the improvement groups, it was found that a key problem for improvement activities is motivation and teamwork, and that what characterises high-performing groups is their information-sharing and communication behaviours. This study also showed that other important factors to consider for this type of improvement work are goal-setting and feedback, as well as management support, both in terms of direct leadership in the improvement groups and in terms of support from other management levels, leading to a number of managerial implications.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 337
页数:14
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, CI changes from suggestion box to organisational learning: Continuous improvement in Europe and Australia
[2]  
[Anonymous], EUROPEAN J PURCHASIN
[3]  
[Anonymous], TPM TEAM GUIDE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, OPERATIONS MANAGEMEN
[5]  
Berger A., 1997, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, V8, P110, DOI 10.1108/09576069710165792
[6]  
BERGMAN B., 2003, QUALITY CUSTOMER NEE
[7]  
Berling C, 2000, TOTAL QUAL MANAGE, V11, pS484
[8]  
Deming W.E., 1986, Out of the crisis
[9]   Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research [J].
Dubois, A ;
Gadde, LE .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2002, 55 (07) :553-560
[10]  
Hackman J.R. e., 1980, Work redesign