THE YIELDING OF PEA (Pisum sativum L.) UNDER DIFFERENT TILLAGE CONDITIONS

被引:0
|
作者
Wozniak, Andrzej [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Life Sci Lublin, PL-20950 Lublin, Poland
来源
ACTA SCIENTIARUM POLONORUM-HORTORUM CULTUS | 2013年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
pea; tillage systems; yield structure; LONG-TERM TILLAGE; REDUCED TILLAGE; SOIL PROPERTIES; CROP-ROTATION; WHEAT YIELD; NITROGEN; SYSTEMS; CONSERVATION; GROWTH; FERTILIZATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Productivity of plants is determined by multiple factors that directly affect one another, therefore yield variability may be high and difficult to predict. Most often, however, a lower crop yield is achieved in the no-tillage system than in the ploughing system. The reported study evaluated the yielding of pea under conventional (ploughing) tillage (shallow ploughing and harrowing after harvest of the previous crop, ploughing in the autumn), reduced tillage (only cultivator after harvest of the previous crop) and herbicide tillage (only Roundup 360 SL after harvest of the previous crop). The highest pea yield was achieved in the conventional tillage, whereas a lower one - by 40.8% - in the herbicide tillage. The conventional tillage system increased the number of pods per 1 m(2), the number of grains per 1 m(2), and grain weight per plant, compared to the herbicide tillage. The yield of pea was correlated with pod number per 1 m(2), grain number per 1 m(2), grain weight per plant, and plant number per 1 m(2). Correlations were also confirmed between pod number per 1 m(2) and grain number per 1 m(2), as well as between plant number per 1 m(2) and pod number per 1 m(2), and between plant number per 1 m(2) and grain number per plant.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 141
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The use of NIR method for evaluation of the pea (Pisum sativum L.) quality
    Urban, J
    Hybl, M
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1999, 45 (01): : 41 - 43
  • [42] Assessment of growth parameters and yield of pea (Pisum sativum) under different irrigation methods
    Singhal, Neha
    Sharma, Poonam
    Sharda, Rakesh
    Siag, Mukesh
    Cutting, Nikhil Gladwin
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2021, 91 (09): : 1378 - 1381
  • [43] DETERMINATION OF FORAGE YIELD AND QUALITY OF PEA (Pisum sativum L.) MIXTURES WITH OAT AND BARLEY
    Kocer, Abdullah
    Albayrak, Sebahattin
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF FIELD CROPS, 2012, 17 (01) : 96 - 99
  • [44] A simple and efficient method of in vivo rapid generation technology in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Mobini, Saeid H.
    Warkentin, Thomas D.
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT, 2016, 52 (05) : 530 - 536
  • [45] Effects of pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars on Thrips tabaci Lindeman preference and performance
    Pobozniak, M.
    Koschier, E. H.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2014, 152 (06) : 885 - 893
  • [46] INDICATORS OF SUSTAINABILITY OF THE SOIL MANAGEMENT IN THE PEA (Pisum sativum L.) PRODUCTION
    Perales, Agustin
    Loli, Oscar
    Alegre, Julio
    Camarena, Felix
    ECOLOGIA APLICADA, 2009, 8 (02): : 47 - 52
  • [47] Introgression of the Afila Gene into Climbing Garden Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Checa, Oscar Eduardo
    Rodriguez, Marino
    Wu, Xingbo
    Blair, Matthew Wohlgemuth
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [48] CLIMATE CHANGE AND FERTILIZATION INTERACTIONS ON PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.) YIELD
    Marton, Laszlo
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2008, 36 : 703 - 706
  • [49] Content of vitamins in grains of Afila pea (Pisum sativum L.) lines
    Djordjevic, R.
    Zecevic, B.
    Markovic, Z.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IIIRD BALKAN SYMPOSIUM ON VEGETABLE AND POTATOES, 2007, (729): : 209 - +
  • [50] Effects of enhanced UV-B radiation on pea (Pisum sativum L) grown under field conditions in the UK
    Mepsted, R
    Paul, ND
    Stephen, J
    Corlett, JE
    Nogues, S
    Baker, NR
    Jones, HG
    Ayres, PG
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 1996, 2 (04) : 325 - 334