THE YIELDING OF PEA (Pisum sativum L.) UNDER DIFFERENT TILLAGE CONDITIONS

被引:0
|
作者
Wozniak, Andrzej [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Life Sci Lublin, PL-20950 Lublin, Poland
来源
ACTA SCIENTIARUM POLONORUM-HORTORUM CULTUS | 2013年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
pea; tillage systems; yield structure; LONG-TERM TILLAGE; REDUCED TILLAGE; SOIL PROPERTIES; CROP-ROTATION; WHEAT YIELD; NITROGEN; SYSTEMS; CONSERVATION; GROWTH; FERTILIZATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Productivity of plants is determined by multiple factors that directly affect one another, therefore yield variability may be high and difficult to predict. Most often, however, a lower crop yield is achieved in the no-tillage system than in the ploughing system. The reported study evaluated the yielding of pea under conventional (ploughing) tillage (shallow ploughing and harrowing after harvest of the previous crop, ploughing in the autumn), reduced tillage (only cultivator after harvest of the previous crop) and herbicide tillage (only Roundup 360 SL after harvest of the previous crop). The highest pea yield was achieved in the conventional tillage, whereas a lower one - by 40.8% - in the herbicide tillage. The conventional tillage system increased the number of pods per 1 m(2), the number of grains per 1 m(2), and grain weight per plant, compared to the herbicide tillage. The yield of pea was correlated with pod number per 1 m(2), grain number per 1 m(2), grain weight per plant, and plant number per 1 m(2). Correlations were also confirmed between pod number per 1 m(2) and grain number per 1 m(2), as well as between plant number per 1 m(2) and pod number per 1 m(2), and between plant number per 1 m(2) and grain number per plant.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 141
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of the Development Process of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Winter Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in Intercropping by Yield Components
    Valyi-Nagy, Marianna
    Racz, Attila
    Irmes, Katalin
    Szentpeteri, Lajos
    Tar, Melinda
    Kassai, Katalin Maria
    Kristo, Istvan
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [32] Response of pea (Pisum sativum L.) to mepiquat chloride under varying application doses and stages
    Elkoca, E
    Kantar, F
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2006, 192 (02) : 102 - 110
  • [33] Response of Normal and Low-Phytate Genotypes of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) on Phosphorus Foliar Fertilization
    Skarpa, Petr
    Skolnikova, Marie
    Antosovsky, Jiri
    Horky, Pavel
    Smykalova, Iva
    Horacek, Jiri
    Dostalova, Radmila
    Kozakova, Zdenka
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2021, 10 (08):
  • [34] NAD pattern and NADH oxidase activity in pea (Pisum sativum L.) under cadmium toxicity
    Smiri M.
    Chaoui A.
    Rouhier N.
    Gelhaye E.
    Jacquot J.-P.
    El Ferjani E.
    Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 2010, 16 (3) : 305 - 315
  • [35] In Vitro Screening for Salinity Tolerance in Garden Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Grozeva, Stanislava
    Kalapchieva, Slavka
    Tringovska, Ivanka
    HORTICULTURAE, 2023, 9 (03)
  • [36] Agronomical factors influencing the legumin/vicilin ratio in pea (Pisum sativum L.) seeds
    Mertens, Cecile
    Dehon, Lydie
    Bourgeois, Audrey
    Verhaeghe-Cartrysse, Christine
    Blecker, Christophe
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2012, 92 (08) : 1591 - 1596
  • [37] The nitrogenous metabolites of pea (Pisum sativum L.): A phytochemical and pharmacological overview
    Fahim, John Refaat
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2024, 175 : 426 - 435
  • [38] Identification and characterization of slow rusting components in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Chand, R
    Srivastava, CP
    Singh, BD
    Sarode, SB
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2006, 53 (02) : 219 - 224
  • [39] Identification and Characterization of Slow Rusting Components in Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    R. Chand
    C. P. Srivastava
    B. D. Singh
    S. B. Sarode
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2006, 53 : 219 - 224
  • [40] Molecular Markers for Powdery Mildew in Pea (Pisum sativum L.): A Review
    Pheirim, Reginah
    Konjengbam, Noren Singh
    Mahanta, Mayurakshee
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2022, 45 (04) : 399 - 409