Using the slope-only technique and estimated glomerular filtration rate for checking the reliability of slope-intercept measurement of glomerular filtration rate

被引:8
|
作者
Bird, Nicholas J. [1 ]
Peters, Christina [1 ]
Michell, A. Robert [2 ]
Peters, A. Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
[2] St Bartholomews Med Sch, William Harvey Res Inst, Dept Biochem Pharmacol, London, England
关键词
Cr-51-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; glomerular filtration rate; iohexol; single sample; validation;
D O I
10.1097/MNM.0b013e328310b378
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Aim To develop a strategy for checking the reliability of slope intercept measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Methods Six blood samples, obtained bilaterally 20-240 min after the injection of Cr-51-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and iohexol into opposite arms, were assayed for indicator injected contralaterally. GFR6(iohexol), the reference value, was measured for all six samples and GFR3(EDTA) (slope-intercept) for the last three samples (per 1.73 m(2)). GFR was measured from the half-time [GFR/extracellular fluid volume (ECV)3(EDTA)], for the single samples at 2-4h (Christensen-Groth; GFR1) and for creatinine [estimated GFR (eGFR)]. Results In six of the 97 studies, the correlation coefficient W of the fit to the last three sample points was less than 0.99. In the remaining 91 studies, GFR3(EDTA) disagreed with GFR/ECVEDTA by more than 15% in 19 studies (group A) and by less than 15% in 72 studies (group 13). GFR3(EDTA) disagreed with GFR6(iohexol) by 12.6% in group A but only by 6.3% in group B (P < 0.001). No such discrimination was displayed by eGFR. Although GFR3(EDTA) was within 15% of GFR6(iohexol) in 14 group A studies, eGFR was within 15% of GFR3(EDTA) in only eight studies and disagreed by more than 15% in six studies. Conversely, in the five of the 19 studies in which GFR3(EDTA) disagreed with GFR6(iohexol) by more than 15%, the agreement between eGFR and GFR3(EDTA) Was less than 15% in two studies and more than 15% in three studies. GFR3(EDTA) was within 15% of GFR/ECV3(EDTA) in all six studies in which r was less than 0.99, and GFR3(EDTA) disagreed with GFR6(iohexol) by less than 15%. Confidence in GFR3(EDTA) was not improved by GFR1 or eGFR. Conclusion Slope intercept GFR is reliable if within 15% of GFR/ECV3. Estimated GFR was ineffective as a second checkpoint. GFR1 did not help when the fit was poor. Nucl Med Commun 29:1086-1092 (c) 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:1086 / 1092
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Errors in measurement of glomerular filtration rate using the slope-intercept technique and their identification
    Oliveira, Ana
    Conway, Lauren
    Heraghty, Neil
    Peters, A. Michael
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 45 (01) : 51 - 60
  • [2] Correction of the slope-intercept method for the measurement of glomerular filtration rate
    Blake, Glen M.
    Barnfield, Mark C.
    Burniston, Maria T.
    Fleming, John S.
    Cosgriff, Philip S.
    Siddique, Musib
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2014, 35 (12) : 1277 - 1283
  • [3] Propagation of measurement errors in glomerular filtration rate determination: a comparison of slope-intercept, single-sample and slope-only methods
    Holness, Jennifer L.
    Fleming, John S.
    Chirehwa, Maxwell T.
    Warwick, James M.
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 40 (04) : 333 - 342
  • [4] Slope-only glomerular filtration rate and single-sample glomerular filtration rate as measurements of the ratio of glomerular filtration rate to extracellular fluid volume
    Peters, A. Michael
    Glass, Daphne M.
    Bird, Nicholas J.
    NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 15 (03) : 281 - 287
  • [5] Comparison between slope-intercept and slope-only techniques for measuring glomerular filtration rate: Use of two independent markers and an independent arbiter
    Bird, Nicholas J.
    Peters, Christina
    Michell, A. Robert
    Peters, A. Michael
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2007, 28 (09) : 711 - 718
  • [6] Calculating the precision of slope-intercept glomerular filtration rate measurements
    Memmott, Matthew J.
    Lawson, Richard S.
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 43 (08) : 959 - 966
  • [7] Correction of slope-intercept glomerular filtration rate measurement without scaling for body size
    McMeekin, Helena
    Burniston, Maria T.
    Barnfield, Mark
    Peters, A. Michael
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 42 (01) : 68 - 72
  • [8] Accuracy of next-day single-sample measurement for low glomerular filtration rate and comparison with same-day slope-intercept glomerular filtration rate
    McMeekin, Helena
    Wickham, Fred
    Fongenie, Ben
    Burniston, Maria
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 42 (02) : 169 - 172
  • [9] Quality control of slope-intercept measurements of glomerular filtration rate using single-sample estimates
    Fleming, JS
    Persaud, L
    Zivanovic, MA
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2005, 26 (08) : 737 - 742
  • [10] An improved equation for correcting slope-intercept measurements of glomerular filtration rate for the single exponential approximation
    Fleming, John S.
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2007, 28 (04) : 315 - 320