Hostility and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the violent victimization-violent offending relationship: affect before cognition?

被引:16
作者
Walters, Glenn D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kutztown State Univ, Dept Criminal Justice, Kutztown, PA 19530 USA
关键词
Violent victimization; violent offending; criminal thinking; hostility;
D O I
10.1080/1478601X.2020.1784163
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was two-fold: 1. determine whether an affective-cognitive construct, hostility, and a cognitive-affective criminal thinking style, reactive criminal thinking (RCT), mediate the relationship between prior violent victimization and future violent offending, and 2. ascertain whether mediator order - hostility before RCT and RCT before hostility - makes a difference in the overall results. Using seven waves of data, three overlapping analyses were performed on data provided by 1,354 youth (1,170 males, 184 females; mean age = 16.04 years) from the Pathways to Desistance study. A two-mediator pathway that placed hostility before RCT (Victimization-1/2/3 -> Hostility-2/3/4 -> RCT-3/4/5 -> Offending-4/5/6) proved significant in all three analyses, whereas the alternate two-mediator pathway, in which the order of the two mediators was reversed (i.e. RCT-2/3/4 -> Hostility-3/4/5), was nonsignificant in two out of the three analyses. Five single-mediator pathways, four of which were mediated by hostility, were also significant. Congruent with aspects of both general strain and criminal lifestyle theories, violent victimization appeared to stimulate short-term situational hostility, which, in turn, facilitated or primed formation of reactive criminal thinking and the youth's eventual participation in criminal violence, although hostility alone had a significant impact on criminal violence as well.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 336
页数:21
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   FOUNDATION FOR A GENERAL STRAIN THEORY OF CRIME AND DELINQUENCY [J].
AGNEW, R .
CRIMINOLOGY, 1992, 30 (01) :47-87
[2]   The General Aggression Model [J].
Allen, Johnie J. ;
Anderson, Craig A. ;
Bushman, Brad J. .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 19 :75-80
[3]  
Allison PD, 2010, HANDBOOK OF SURVEY RESEARCH, 2ND EDITION, P631
[4]   VIOLENCE BEGETS VIOLENCE ... BUT HOW? A DECISION-MAKING PERSPECTIVE ON THE VICTIM-OFFENDER OVERLAP [J].
Averdijk, Margit ;
van Gelder, Jean-Louis ;
Eisner, Manuel ;
Ribeaud, Denis .
CRIMINOLOGY, 2016, 54 (02) :282-306
[5]   THE VICTIM-OFFENDER OVERLAP IN CONTEXT: EXAMINING THE ROLE OF NEIGHBORHOOD STREET CULTURE [J].
Berg, Mark T. ;
Stewart, Eric A. ;
Schreck, Christopher J. ;
Simons, Ronald L. .
CRIMINOLOGY, 2012, 50 (02) :359-390
[6]   A test of general strain theory [J].
Broidy, LM .
CRIMINOLOGY, 2001, 39 (01) :9-36
[7]   SOCIAL-CHANGE AND CRIME RATE TRENDS - ROUTINE ACTIVITY APPROACH [J].
COHEN, LE ;
FELSON, M .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1979, 44 (04) :588-608
[8]   Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling [J].
Cole, DA ;
Maxwell, SE .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 112 (04) :558-577
[9]   A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures [J].
Collins, LM ;
Schafer, JL ;
Kam, CM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2001, 6 (04) :330-351
[10]  
Crick NR, 1996, CHILD DEV, V67, P993, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01778.x