Is a new paradigm needed to explain how inhaled anesthetics produce immobility?

被引:76
作者
Eger, Edmond I., II [1 ]
Raines, Douglas E. [2 ,3 ]
Shafer, Steven L. [4 ]
Hemmings, Hugh C., Jr. [5 ,6 ]
Sonner, James M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Anesthesia & Perioperat Care, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Anesthesia, New York, NY USA
[5] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY USA
[6] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Pharmacol, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1213/ane.0b013e318182aedb
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
A paradox arises from present information concerning the mechanism(s) by which inhaled anesthetics produce immobility in the face of noxious stimulation. Several findings, such as additivity, suggest a common site at which inhaled anesthetics act to produce immobility. However, two decades of focused investigation have not identified a ligand- or voltage-gated channel that alone is sufficient to mediate immobility. Indeed, most putative targets provide minimal or no mediation. For example, opioid, 5-HT3, gamma-aminobutyric acid type A and glutamate receptors, and, potassium and calcium channels appear to be irrelevant or play only minor roles. Furthermore, no combination of actions on ligand- or voltage-gated channels seems sufficient. A few plausible targets (e.g., sodium channels) merit further study, but there remains the possibility that immobilization results from a nonspecific mechanism.
引用
收藏
页码:832 / 848
页数:17
相关论文
共 232 条
[91]  
JOHNSTON RR, 1975, ANESTH ANALG, V54, P655
[92]   ENHANCEMENT OF GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID-ACTIVATED CL- CURRENTS IN CULTURED RAT HIPPOCAMPAL-NEURONS BY 3 VOLATILE ANESTHETICS [J].
JONES, MV ;
BROOKS, PA ;
HARRISON, NL .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1992, 449 :279-293
[93]   Blockade of AMPA receptors and volatile anesthetics - Reduced anesthetic requirements in GluR2 null mutant mice for loss of the righting reflex and antinociception but not minimum alveolar concentration [J].
Joo, DT ;
Gong, D ;
Sonner, JM ;
Jia, ZP ;
MacDonald, JF ;
Eger, EI ;
Orser, BA .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 94 (03) :478-488
[94]   General anesthetic actions in vivo strongly attenuated by a point mutation in the GABAA receptor β3 subunit [J].
Jurd, R ;
Arras, M ;
Lambert, S ;
Drexler, B ;
Siegwart, R ;
Crestani, F ;
Zaugg, M ;
Vogt, KE ;
Ledermann, B ;
Antkowiak, B ;
Rudolph, U .
FASEB JOURNAL, 2002, 16 (14) :250-+
[95]   Effects of sevoflurane, propofol and adjunct nitrous oxide on regional cerebral blood flow, oxygen consumption, and blood volume in humans [J].
Kaisti, KK ;
Långsjö, JW ;
Aalto, S ;
Oikonen, V ;
Sipilä, H ;
Teräs, M ;
Hinkka, S ;
Metsähonkala, L ;
Scheinin, H .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 99 (03) :603-613
[96]   Increased γ-aminobutyric acid levels in mouse brain induce loss of righting reflex, but not immobility, in response to noxious stimulation [J].
Katayama, Sohtaro ;
Irifune, Masahiro ;
Kikuchi, Nobuhito ;
Takarada, Tohru ;
Shimizu, Yoshitaka ;
Endo, Chic ;
Takata, Takashi ;
Dohi, Toshihiro ;
Sato, Tomoaki ;
Kawahara, Michio .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 104 (06) :1422-1429
[97]   The effects of fentanyl on sevoflurane requirements for loss of consciousness and skin incision [J].
Katoh, T ;
Ikeda, K .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 88 (01) :18-24
[98]   The effect of fentanyl on sevoflurane requirements for somatic and sympathetic responses to surgical incision [J].
Katoh, T ;
Kobayashi, S ;
Suzuki, A ;
Iwamoto, T ;
Bito, H ;
Ikeda, K .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (02) :398-405
[99]   OPIOID MONOAMINE INTERACTIONS IN SPINAL ANTINOCICEPTION - EVIDENCE FOR SEROTONIN BUT NOT NOREPINEPHRINE RECIPROCITY [J].
KELLSTEIN, DE ;
MALSEED, RT ;
GOLDSTEIN, FJ .
PAIN, 1988, 34 (01) :85-92
[100]  
KENDIG JJ, 1981, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V218, P175