The economics of biotechnology under ecosystem disruption

被引:20
作者
Pemsl, Diemuth E. [1 ,2 ]
Gutierrez, Andrew P. [3 ]
Waibel, Hermann [2 ]
机构
[1] WorldFish Ctr, Policy Econ & Social Sci Discipline, George Town, Malaysia
[2] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Dev & Agr Econ, Hannover, Germany
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
bio-economic model; biotechnology; Bt cotton; ecosystem; China;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.022
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Economic analysis of chemical pesticide use has shown that the interactions between plants, pests, damage control technology and state of the ecosystem are important variables to be considered. Hence, a bio-economic model was developed for the assessment of Bt variety and pesticide-based control strategies of the cotton-bollworm in China. The model simulates plant growth, the dynamics of pest populations and of natural enemies. The model predictions are used as major inputs for a stochastic micro-level profit model of alternative control strategies. Results show that: (1) productivity effects of Bt varieties and pesticide use depend on the action of natural control agents, and (2) the profitability of damage control measures increases with the severity of ecosystem disruption, The findings highlight the importance of the choice of the counterfactual scenario in the assessment of the impact of agricultural biotechnology. Also, some doubts are raised whether the high benefits of Bt cotton varieties claimed by previous studies based on cross section comparisons are realistic. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 183
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
CARPENTER JE, 2001, NATL CTR FOOD AGR PO, V46
[2]   Sprayed to death: Path dependence, lock-in and pest control strategies [J].
Cowan, R ;
Gunby, P .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1996, 106 (436) :521-542
[3]  
Dasgupta P., 1979, EC THEORY EXHAUSTIBL
[4]  
DEGROOTE H, 2005, 9 ICABR INT C BIOT R
[5]  
EHLER LE, 1974, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V2, P1009
[6]  
EVELEENS KG, 1974, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V2, P497
[7]   A COMPARISON OF SEASON-LONG COTTON-PEST-CONTROL PROGRAMS IN CALIFORNIA DURING 1966 [J].
FALCON, LA ;
VANDENBO.R ;
FERRIS, CA ;
STROMBERG, LK ;
ETZEL, LK ;
STINNER, RE ;
LEIGH, TF .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1968, 61 (03) :633-+
[8]   An Australian approach to IPM in cotton: integrating new technologies to minimise insecticide dependence [J].
Fitt, GP .
CROP PROTECTION, 2000, 19 (8-10) :793-800
[9]  
Fleischer G., 2000, Agrarwirtschaft, V49, P379
[10]   Physiologically based demographics of Bt cotton-pest interactions - II. Temporal refuges, natural enemy interactions [J].
Gutierrez, AP ;
Adamczyk, JJ ;
Ponsard, S ;
Ellis, CK .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2006, 191 (3-4) :360-382