The effectiveness of wet-cupping for nonspecific low back pain in Iran: A randomized controlled trial

被引:107
作者
Farhadi, Khosro [1 ]
Schwebel, David C. [2 ]
Saeb, Morteza [3 ]
Choubsaz, Mansour [1 ]
Mohammadi, Reza [4 ]
Ahmadi, Alireza [1 ]
机构
[1] Kermanshah Univ Med Sci, Dept Anesthesiol Crit Care & Pain Management, Pain Res Ctr, Kermanshah 6718818838, Iran
[2] Univ Alabama, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Kermanshah Univ Med Sci, Dept Orthoped Surg, Kermanshah 6718818838, Iran
[4] Karolinska Inst, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Low back pain; Wet-cupping; Hijama; Iran;
D O I
10.1016/j.ctim.2008.05.003
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine the efficacy of wet-cupping for treating persistent nonspecific low back pain. Background: Wet-cupping therapy is one of the oldest known medical techniques. It is still used in several contemporary societies. Very minimal empirical study has been conducted on its efficacy. Design: Randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. Patients in the experimental group were offered the option of referral to the wet-cupping service; all accepted that option. The control group received usual care. Setting: Medical clinic in Kermanshah, Iran. Participants: In total, 98 patients aged 17-68 years with nonspecific low back pain; 48 were randomly assigned to experimental group and 50 to the control group. Intervention: Patients in the experimental group were prescribed a series of three staged wet-cupping treatments, placed at 3 days intervals (i.e., 0, 3, and 6 days). Patients in the control group received usual care from their general practitioner. Main outcome measures: Three outcomes assessed at baseline and again 3 months following intervention: the McGill Present Pain Index, Oswestry Pain Disability Index, and the Medication Quantification Scale. Results: Wet-cupping care was associated with clinically significant improvement at 3-month follow-up. The experimental group who received wet-cupping care had significantly lower levels of pain intensity ([95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72-2.60] mean difference = 2.17, p < 0.01), pain-retated disability (95% CI = 11.18-18.82, means difference = 14.99, p < 0.01), and medication use (95% Cl = 3.60-9.50, mean difference = 6.55, p < 0.01) than the control group. The differences in all three measures were maintained after controlling for age, gender, and duration of tower back pain in regression models (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Traditional wet-cupping care delivered in a primary care setting was safe and acceptable to patients with nonspecific tow back pain. Wet-cupping care was significantly more effective in reducing bodily pain than usual care at 3-month follow-up. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 15
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   The efficacy of wet-cupping in the treatment of tension and migraine headache [J].
Ahmadi, Alireza ;
Schwebel, David C. ;
Rezaei, Mansour .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (01) :37-44
[2]   Evaluating and managing acute low back pain in the primary care setting [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Deyo, RA .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 16 (02) :120-131
[3]  
Baker D., 1989, Back Pain. New Approaches To Rehabilitation And Education, P174
[4]   Central pain control [J].
Calvino, B ;
Grilo, RM .
JOINT BONE SPINE, 2006, 73 (01) :10-16
[5]  
Chirali IZ, 1999, CUPPING THERAPY TRAD, P3
[6]  
Croft P., 1997, HLTH CARE NEEDS ASSE, V2nd, P129
[7]  
*DEP HLTH, 1999, PREV BACK PAIN GREAT
[8]   Complementary and alternative pain therapy in the emergency department [J].
Dillard, JN ;
Knapp, S .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 23 (02) :529-+
[9]  
ENGSTROM JW, HARRISONS PRINCIPLES, P94
[10]  
Fairbank J C, 1980, Physiotherapy, V66, P271