Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices

被引:211
|
作者
Ioannidis, John P. A. [1 ]
Fanelli, Daniele [1 ]
Dunne, Debbie Drake [1 ]
Goodman, Steven N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Meta Res Innovat Ctr Stanford METRICS, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
PLOS BIOLOGY | 2015年 / 13卷 / 10期
关键词
BIOMEDICAL-RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
As the scientific enterprise has grown in size and diversity, we need empirical evidence on the research process to test and apply interventions that make it more efficient and its results more reliable. Meta-research is an evolving scientific discipline that aims to evaluate and improve research practices. It includes thematic areas of methods, reporting, reproducibility, evaluation, and incentives (how to do, report, verify, correct, and reward science). Much work is already done in this growing field, but efforts to-date are fragmented. We provide a map of ongoing efforts and discuss plans for connecting the multiple meta-research efforts across science worldwide.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reducing Research Waste Through Good Reporting Practices
    Okumura, Yasuyuki
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (08) : 397 - 398
  • [32] Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories
    Garijo, Daniel
    Menager, Herve
    Hwang, Lorraine
    Trisovic, Ana
    Hucka, Michael
    Morrell, Thomas
    Allen, Alice
    PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2022, 8
  • [33] Ethics and international business research: Considerations and best practices
    Miller, Stewart R.
    Moore, Fiona
    Eden, Lorraine
    INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2024, 33 (01)
  • [34] Analysis of practices to promote reproducibility and transparency in anaesthesiology research
    Okonya, Ochije
    Rorah, Drayton
    Tritz, Daniel
    Umberham, Blake
    Wiley, Matt
    Vassar, Matt
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 125 (05) : 835 - 842
  • [35] Questionable Research Practices and Open Science in Quantitative Criminology
    Jason M. Chin
    Justin T. Pickett
    Simine Vazire
    Alex O. Holcombe
    Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2023, 39 : 21 - 51
  • [36] Questionable Research Practices and Open Science in Quantitative Criminology
    Chin, Jason M.
    Pickett, Justin T.
    Vazire, Simine
    Holcombe, Alex O.
    JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2023, 39 (01) : 21 - 51
  • [37] Statistical Methods Used for the Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Nutrition Assessment Tools Used in Medical Research
    Bountziouka, Vassiliki
    Panagiotakos, Demosthenes B.
    CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2010, 16 (34) : 3770 - 3775
  • [38] Lack of research reproducibility, the rise of open science and the need for continuing education in research methods
    Haring, R.
    Bell, R. J.
    CLIMACTERIC, 2018, 21 (05) : 413 - 414
  • [39] Research as discovery or delivery? Exploring the implications of cultural repertoires and career demands for junior economists' research practices
    Steffy, Kody
    Langfeldt, Liv
    HIGHER EDUCATION, 2023, 86 (02) : 317 - 332
  • [40] Imaging methods are vastly underreported in biomedical research
    Marques, Guillermo
    Pengo, Thomas
    Sanders, Mark A.
    ELIFE, 2020, 9