Applied Online Crowdsourcing in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery A Comparison of Aesthetic Outcomes in Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair Techniques

被引:25
作者
Suchyta, Marissa [1 ]
Azad, Amee [2 ]
Patel, Ashraf A. [3 ]
Khosla, Rohit K. [4 ]
Lorenz, H. Peter [4 ]
Nazerali, Rahim S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Plast Surg, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[3] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Sch Med, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
cleft lip; unilateral cleft lip; orofacial cleft; Millard; Mohler; fisher; outcomes; aesthetic; scar; layperson; crowdsourcing; Mechanical Turk; survey; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000002389
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Aesthetic outcomes of unilateral cleft lip repairs have important psychosocial implications for patients who are heavily influenced by social perceptions. Online crowdsourcing offers the unique potential to efficiently recruit large numbers of laypeople to assess public perception. The aim of this study was to use the online crowdsourcing platform Mechanical Turk to compare the postoperative outcomes of Fisher, Millard, and Mohler cleft lip repair techniques. Methods Two hundred fifty-four participants were recruited through Mechanical Turk to evaluate 29 cropped and deidentified photographs of children, 8 photographs were controls without cleft lips and 21 were children with unilateral cleft lips who had undergone Fisher, Millard, or Mohler repairs (7 in each group). Respondents were asked whether a scar was present, whether they would be personally satisfied with the surgical result and used a Likert scale from 1 to 5 to rate overall appearance, scar severity, and nasal symmetry. Results Fewer respondents reported that a scar was present when assessing postoperative photographs of Fisher repairs (70.3 +/- 8.6%) compared with Millard (92.0 +/- 1.5%) or Mohler (88.8 +/- 3.1%) repairs. Average rating of scar severity was also lower for Fisher (1.9) compared with Millard (2.6) or Mohler (2.6) repairs. Average ratings of nose symmetry, general appearance, and satisfaction with operative result were not statistically significantly different between the repair groups. Conclusions This study demonstrates the potential of online crowdsourcing to assess public perception of plastic surgery outcomes. The Mechanical Turk platform offers a reduction in selection bias, ease of study design, and enhanced efficiency of large-scale participant recruitment. Results indicate that the Fisher repair led to the most favored aesthetic outcomes compared with the Millard and Mohler techniques, particularly with regard to scar severity. Crowdsourcing is a powerful tool to assess layperson perception of plastic surgery outcomes and can be used to better guide surgical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:S307 / S310
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] ASHERMCDADE C, 1991, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V28, P385, DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(1991)028<0385:DOAMFR>2.3.CO
  • [2] 2
  • [3] The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research
    Behrend, Tara S.
    Sharek, David J.
    Meade, Adam W.
    Wiebe, Eric N.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2011, 43 (03) : 800 - 813
  • [4] Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?
    Buhrmester, Michael
    Kwang, Tracy
    Gosling, Samuel D.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) : 3 - 5
  • [5] Cunningham S J, 1999, Dent Update, V26, P438
  • [6] Comparative Evaluation of Esthetic Outcomes in Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair Between the Mohler and Fisher Repair Techniques: A Prospective, Randomized, Observer-Blind Study
    Deshmukh, Mazin
    Vaidya, Sushrut
    Deshpande, Gaurav
    Galinde, Jyotsna
    Natarajan, Srivalli
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 77 (01) : 182.e1 - 182.e8
  • [7] Unilateral cleft lip repair: An anatomical subunit approximation technique
    Fisher, DM
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 116 (01) : 61 - 71
  • [8] Aesthetic outcome of cleft lip and palate treatment. Perceptions of patients, families, and health professionals compared to the general public
    Gkantidis, Nikolaos
    Papamanou, Despina A.
    Christou, Panagiotis
    Topouzelis, Nikolaos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 41 (07) : E105 - E110
  • [9] Glener AD, 2017, PRS-GLOB OPEN, V5, DOI 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001373
  • [10] Assessing the Fisher, Mohler, and Millard Techniques of Cleft Lip Repair Surgery With Eye-Tracking Technology
    Kwong, Jeffrey W.
    Cai, Lawrence Z.
    Azad, Amee D.
    Lorenz, H. Peter
    Khosla, Rohit K.
    Lee, Gordon K.
    Nazerali, Rahim S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 82 : S313 - S319