Maternal Preference for Cesarean Delivery Do Women Get What They Want?

被引:34
作者
Fuglenes, Dorthe [1 ]
Aas, Eline
Botten, Grete
Oian, Pal
Kristiansen, Ivar Sonbo
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Hlth Management & Hlth Econ, NO-0317 Oslo, Norway
关键词
SECTION; MODE; OBSTETRICIANS; ATTITUDES; REQUEST; WISH;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182605b1a
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between delivery preferences during pregnancy and actual delivery mode. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study using data from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (N = 65,959). We analyzed predictors of birth outcome by means of women's preferences for mode or delivery and a range of medical and socioeconomic factors with multivariable logistic regression models. The term "elective" cesarean delivery includes cesarean deliveries planned 8 hours or more before delivery and performed as planned. RESULTS: When asked about delivery preference at 30 weeks of gestation, 5% of the women reported a preference for a cesarean delivery, 84% had a preference for vaginal delivery, and 11% were neutral. Among those with a cesarean delivery preference, 48% subsequently had a cesarean delivery (12% acute and 36% elective), and of those with a vaginal preference 12% delivered by cesarean (8.7% acute and 3.1% elective). When adjusting for maternal characteristics and medical indications, the odds for an acute cesarean delivery among nulliparous women with a cesarean delivery preference was almost two times higher (odds ratio [OR] 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49-2.62) and for elective cesarean delivery the preference was 12 times higher (OR 12.61, 95% CI 9.69-16.42) than for women with a vaginal preference. For multiparous women, the corresponding figures were OR 3.13 (95% CI 1.39-7.05) and OR 10.04 (95% CI 4.59-21.99). When multiparous women with previous cesarean deliveries were excluded, the OR for an elective cesarean delivery was 26 times higher given a cesarean delivery preference compared with a vaginal delivery preference (OR 25.78, 95% CI 7.89-84.28). Based on a small subset of women with planned cesarean delivery on maternal request (n = 560), we estimated a predicted probability of 16% for nulliparous women (25% for multiparous women) for such cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women's expressed preferences for delivery mode were associated with both elective and acute cesarean deliveries. (Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120:252-60) DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182605b1a
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 260
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why? [J].
Angeja, A. C. E. ;
Washington, A. E. ;
Vargas, J. E. ;
Gomez, R. ;
Rojas, I. ;
Caughey, A. B. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (11) :1253-1258
[2]  
[Anonymous], NORW MOTH CHILD COH
[3]   Preferences and concerns for delivery: an antepartum survey [J].
Bracken, Jessica N. ;
Dryfhout, Vicki L. ;
Goldenhar, Linda M. ;
Pauls, Rachel N. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2008, 19 (11) :1527-1531
[4]   The standard primipara as a basis for inter-unit comparisons of maternity care [J].
Cleary, R ;
Beard, RW ;
Chapple, J ;
Coles, J ;
Griffin, M ;
Joffe, M ;
Welch, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (03) :223-229
[5]  
D'Alton ME, 2006, OBSTET GYNECOL, V107, P1386
[6]   Cesarean delivery and the risk-benefit calculus [J].
Ecker, Jeffrey L. ;
Frigoletto, Fredric D., Jr. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (09) :885-888
[7]  
Edwards G J, 2001, J Obstet Gynaecol, V21, P128
[8]   Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean? The influence of parity, delivery experiences, and fear [J].
Fuglenes, Dorthe ;
Aas, Eline ;
Botten, Grete ;
Oian, Pal ;
Kristiansen, Ivar Sonbo .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 205 (01) :45.e1-45.e9
[9]  
Greene H.W., 2008, ECONOMETRIC ANAL, V6th
[10]   Caesarean section on request:: a comparison of obstetricians' attitudes in eight European countries [J].
Habiba, M. ;
Kaminski, M. ;
Da Fre, M. ;
Marsal, K. ;
Bleker, O. ;
Librero, J. ;
Grandjean, H. ;
Gratia, P. ;
Guaschino, S. ;
Heyl, W. ;
Taylor, D. ;
Cuttini, M. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (06) :647-656