Consistency Meets Inconsistency: A Unified Graph Learning Framework for Multi-view Clustering

被引:113
作者
Liang, Youwei [1 ]
Huang, Dong [1 ]
Wang, Chang-Dong [2 ]
机构
[1] South China Agr Univ, Coll Math & Informat, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Data & Comp Sci, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
2019 19TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING (ICDM 2019) | 2019年
关键词
Multi-view graph learning; Multi-view clustering; Graph fusion; Consistency; Inconsistency;
D O I
10.1109/ICDM.2019.00148
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Graph Learning has emerged as a promising technique for multi-view clustering, and has recently attracted lots of attention due to its capability of adaptively learning a unified and probably better graph from multiple views. However, the existing multi-view graph learning methods mostly focus on the multi-view consistency, but neglect the potential multi-view inconsistency (which may be incurred by noise, corruptions, or view-specific characteristics). To address this, this paper presents a new graph learning-based multi-view clustering approach, which for the first time, to our knowledge, simultaneously and explicitly formulates the multi-view consistency and the multi-view inconsistency in a unified optimization model. To solve this model, a new alternating optimization scheme is designed, where the consistent and inconsistent parts of each single-view graph as well as the unified graph that fuses the consistent parts of all views can be iteratively learned. It is noteworthy that our multi-view graph learning model is applicable to both similarity graphs and dissimilarity graphs, leading to two graph fusion-based variants, namely, distance (dissimilarity) graph fusion and similarity graph fusion. Experiments on various multi-view datasets demonstrate the superiority of our approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1204 / 1209
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CIVR
[2]   Robust Spectral Clustering for Noisy Data Modeling Sparse Corruptions Improves Latent Embeddings [J].
Bojchevski, Aleksandar ;
Matkovic, Yves ;
Guennemann, Stephan .
KDD'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2017, :737-746
[3]  
Dua D., 2017, UCI Machine Learning Repository
[4]  
Duchi J, 2008, P 25 INT C MACH LEAR, P272, DOI 10.1145/1390156.1390191
[5]  
Greene D., 2006, P 23 INT C MACHINE L, P377, DOI [10.1145/1143844.1143892, DOI 10.1145/1143844.1143892, 10 . 1145 / 1143844 . 1143892]
[6]  
Huang D., 2019, IEEE TKDE
[7]  
Huang HC, 2012, PROC CVPR IEEE, P773, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6247748
[8]   Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means [J].
Jain, Anil K. .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2010, 31 (08) :651-666
[9]  
Kumar D, 2011, 29TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, P1413
[10]  
Li Y., 2015, AAAI