Exploring the Dimensions of Organizational Performance: A Construct Validity Study

被引:107
作者
Hamann, P. Maik [1 ]
Schiemann, Frank [1 ,2 ]
Bellora, Lucia [1 ]
Guenther, Thomas W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Business Management & Econ, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Sch Business Econ & Social Sci, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
factor analysis; quantitative research; reliability and validity; measurement models; organizational performance; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; STRATEGY RESEARCH; FIRM PERFORMANCE; FIT INDEXES; MANAGEMENT; VARIABLES; MODELS; MATTER; MARKET; SIZE;
D O I
10.1177/1094428112470007
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Organizational performance is a fundamental construct in strategic management. Recently, researchers proposed a framework for organizational performance that includes three dimensions: accounting returns, growth, and stock market performance. We test the construct validity of indicators of these dimensions by examining reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and nomological validity. We conduct a confirmatory factor analysis with 19 analytically derived indicators on a sample of 37,262 firm-years for 4,868 listed U.S. organizations from 1990 to 2010. Our results provide evidence of four, rather than three, organizational performance dimensions. Stock market performance and growth are confirmed as separate dimensions, whereas accounting returns must be decomposed into profitability and liquidity dimensions. Robustness analyses indicate stability of our inferences for three dissimilar industries and for a period of 21 years but reveal that organizational performance dimensions underlie dynamics during years in which environmental instability is high. Our study provides an initial contribution to the clarification of the important organizational performance construct by defining four dimensions and validating indicators for each dimension. Thus, we provide essential groundwork for the measurement of organizational performance in future empirical studies.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 87
页数:21
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[2]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[3]  
Bagozzi R. P., 1988, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, V16, P74, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF02723327, 10.1007/bf02723327]
[4]  
Bagozzi R.P., 1994, PRINCIPLE MARKETING, P386
[5]   ASSESSING CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH [J].
BAGOZZI, RP ;
LI, YJ ;
PHILLIPS, LW .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1991, 36 (03) :421-458
[6]   Survivorship and the economic grim reaper [J].
Baker, GP ;
Kennedy, RE .
JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 2002, 18 (02) :324-361
[7]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[8]   When is more better? The impact of business scale and scope on long-term business survival, while controlling for profitability [J].
Bercovitz, Janet ;
Mitchell, Will .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (01) :61-79
[9]   Defining management accounting constructs: A methodological note on the risks of conceptual misspecification [J].
Bisbe, Josep ;
Batista-Foguet, Joan-Manuel ;
Chenhall, Robert .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2007, 32 (7-8) :789-820
[10]   Construct measurement in strategic management research: Illusion or reality? [J].
Boyd, BK ;
Gove, S ;
Hitt, MA .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :239-257