Statistics in brief:: The importance of sample size in the planning and interpretation of medical research

被引:250
作者
Biau, David Jean [1 ]
Kerneis, Solen [1 ]
Porcher, Raphael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 07, Hop St Louis, AP HP, Dept Biostat & Informat Med,INSERM UMR S 717, F-75475 Paris 10, France
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s11999-008-0346-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The increasing volume of research by the medical community often leads to increasing numbers of contradictory findings and conclusions. Although the differences observed may represent true differences, the results also may differ because of sampling variability as all studies are performed on a limited number of specimens or patients. When planning a study reporting differences among groups of patients or describing some variable in a single group, sample size should be considered because it allows the researcher to control for the risk of reporting a false-negative finding (Type II error) or to estimate the precision his or her experiment will yield. Equally important, readers of medical journals should understand sample size because such understanding is essential to interpret the relevance of a finding with regard to their own patients. At the time of planning, the investigator must establish (1) a justifiable level of statistical significance, (2) the chances of detecting a difference of given magnitude between the groups compared, ie, the power, (3) this targeted difference (ie, effect size), and (4) the variability of the data (for quantitative data). We believe correct planning of experiments is an ethical issue of concern to the entire community.
引用
收藏
页码:2282 / 2288
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Altman DG, 1999, Practical Statistics for Medical Research, DOI DOI 10.1002/SIM.4780101015
  • [2] Bacchetti P, 2005, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V161, P105, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwi014
  • [3] Type II error in the spine surgical literature
    Bailey, CS
    Fisher, CG
    Dvorak, MF
    [J]. SPINE, 2004, 29 (10) : 1146 - 1149
  • [4] The advantages and disadvantages of adaptive designs for clinical trials
    Bauer, P
    Brannath, W
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2004, 9 (08) : 351 - 357
  • [5] Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department
    Bijur, PE
    Latimer, CT
    Gallagher, EJ
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 10 (04) : 390 - 392
  • [6] Cohen J., 1988, POWERSTATISTICALSCIE, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
  • [7] SELECTION BIAS IN OBSERVATIONAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
    ELLENBERG, JH
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1994, 13 (5-7) : 557 - 567
  • [8] Sample size and statistical power of randomised, controlled trials in orthopaedics
    Freedman, KB
    Back, S
    Bernstein, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2001, 83B (03): : 397 - 402
  • [9] THE USE OF PREDICTED CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS WHEN PLANNING EXPERIMENTS AND THE MISUSE OF POWER WHEN INTERPRETING RESULTS
    GOODMAN, SN
    BERLIN, JA
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 121 (03) : 200 - 206
  • [10] The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trials
    Halpern, SD
    Karlawish, JHT
    Berlin, JA
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (03): : 358 - 362