Performance evaluation of integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) utilizing a blended solution of ammonia and 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) for CO2 capture

被引:34
作者
Asif, Muhammad [1 ]
Bak, Chul-u [1 ]
Saleem, Muhammad Wajid [1 ]
Kim, Woo-Seung [2 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Seoul 133791, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ansan, Kyeonggi Do, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Coal; Climate change; CO2; capture; Gasification; IGCC; GAS SHIFT REACTION; CARBON-DIOXIDE CAPTURE; POWER-PLANT; PROCESS SIMULATION; COAL-GASIFICATION; REACTION-KINETICS; SYSTEMS; HEAT; SEPARATION; PART;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2015.08.008
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
IGCC is an emerging clean coal technology with the potential to produce electricity without damaging the ecosystem. However, efficiency enhancement of the IGCC when pollutant emissions are included in the system is a critical issue that should be evaluated further. In this paper, a large-scale IGCC system is modeled and simulated in three configurations: IGCC without CO2 capture, IGCC with pre-combustion capture, and IGCC with post-combustion capture. The validated model of CO2 capture based on a blended solution of ammonia and AMP is integrated with the IGCC to evaluate system performance in terms of net power produced, efficiency penalty due to CO2 capture, and energy losses in various sections of the IGCC. Moreover, an exergy analysis is carried out to investigate the loss of useful work in major sections of the IGCC for three cases (IGCC without capture, IGCC with pre-capture and IGCC with post-capture). The results indicated that the chemical absorption-based blended solution of AMP and NH3 is an attractive option due to its high CO2 loading capacity and low heat duty requirement; it can also be applied to both the IGCC with pre-combustion capture and IGCC with post-combustion capture. However, IGCC with post-combustion capture is more efficient because the net power produced from IGCC with post-combustion capture (561 MW) is greater than the power obtained from IGCC with pre-combustion capture (518 MW). The efficiency loss due to CO2 was 1.1% for post-combustion capture and 4.3% for pre-combustion capture. Furthermore, about 65% of the total exergy loss was observed in the gasifier and gas turbine combustor only, whereas 41.5% of the total power produced was consumed in the gas turbine compressor and air separation unit. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 524
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
ALSTOM, 2011, POW EN REC, P12
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, APDV ASPENTECH 12 1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, ADV ENG THERMODYNAMI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, PROGR UPDATE AIR BLO
[5]  
Asif M, 2014, SEP SCI TECHNOL
[6]   Modeling and simulation of the combined removal of SO2 and CO2 by aqueous ammonia [J].
Asif, Muhammad ;
Kim, Woo-Seung .
GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 4 (04) :509-527
[7]  
Bakshi BR, 2011, THERMODYNAMICS DESTR
[8]  
Bejan A., 1999, Thermodynamic Optimization of Complex Energy Systems
[9]   Post-combustion CO2 capture from a natural gas combined cycle by CaO/CaCO3 looping [J].
Berstad, David ;
Anantharaman, Rahul ;
Jordal, Kristin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2012, 11 :25-33
[10]   Steady-State Simulation and Optimization of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Power Plant with CO2 Capture [J].
Bhattacharyya, Debangsu ;
Turton, Richard ;
Zitney, Stephen E. .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2011, 50 (03) :1674-1690