Surrogate Model-Based Control Considering Uncertainties for Composite Fuselage Assembly

被引:52
作者
Yue, Xiaowei [1 ]
Wen, Yuchen [1 ]
Hunt, Jeffrey H. [2 ]
Shi, Jianjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, H Milton Stewart Sch Ind & Syst Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Boeing Co, 900 N Sepulveda Blvd, El Segundo, CA 90245 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2018年 / 140卷 / 04期
关键词
composite assembly; shape control; assembly deviation prediction; surrogate model; finite element analysis; uncertainty; DIMENSIONAL QUALITY; PROPAGATION; SIMULATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1115/1.4038510
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Shape control of composite parts is vital for large-scale production and integration of composite materials in the aerospace industry. The current industry practice of shape control uses passive manual metrology. This has three major limitations: (i) low efficiency: it requires multiple trials and a longer time to achieve the desired shape during the assembly process; (ii) nonoptimal: it is challenging to reach optimal deviation reduction; and (iii) experience-dependent: highly skilled engineers are required during the assembly process. This paper describes an automated shape control system that can adjust composite parts to an optimal configuration in a manner that is highly effective and efficient. The objective is accomplished by (i) building a finite element analysis (FEA) platform, validated by experimental data; (ii) developing a surrogate model with consideration of actuator uncertainty, part uncertainty, modeling uncertainty, and unquantified uncertainty to achieve predictive performance and embedding the model into a feed-forward control algorithm; and (iii) conducting multivariable optimization to determine the optimal actions of actuators. We show that the surrogate model considering uncertainties (SMU) achieves satisfactory prediction performance and that the automated optimal shape control system can significantly reduce the assembly time with improved dimensional quality.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Abad A. G., 2011, J MANUFACTURING SCI, V133, P2011
[2]   Stochastic Kriging for Simulation Metamodeling [J].
Ankenman, Bruce ;
Nelson, Barry L. ;
Staum, Jeremy .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, 58 (02) :371-382
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, QUAL ENG
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, APPL LINEAR STAT MOD
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, INTERPOLATION SPATIA
[6]  
ANSYS, 2013, ANSYS COMP PREPPOST
[7]  
Ayyub B.M., 2006, Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis in Engineering and the Sciences
[8]  
Basar Tamer, 1995, H-infinity Optimal Control and Related Minimax Design Problems: A Dynamic Game Approach
[9]  
Boyd L., 2004, CONVEX OPTIMIZATION
[10]   Modeling variation propagation of multi-station assembly systems with compliant parts [J].
Camelio, J ;
Hu, SJ ;
Ceglarek, D .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2003, 125 (04) :673-681