Bioequivalence of two rimantadine tablet formulations in healthy male volunteers after single dose administration

被引:0
|
作者
Chládek, J [1 ]
Sispera, L [1 ]
Martínková, J [1 ]
Zaludek, B [1 ]
Sova, P [1 ]
Mièuda, S [1 ]
Grim, J [1 ]
Cermanová, J [1 ]
Zaludek, B [1 ]
Sova, P [1 ]
Franc, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pharmacol, CZ-50001 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
关键词
rimantadine; pharmacokinetics; bioequivalence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aim: The bioequivalence of two rimantadine tablet formulations was determined. Methods: The study was designed as a randomized, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers received a single 100 mg; dose of rimantadine hydrochloride as test (Rimantadin Lachema 100 tbl. obd., produced by Lachema, a.s., Brno, Czech Republic) and reference formulations (Flumadine 100 tbl. obd., produced by Forest Pharmaceuticals, St. Louis, USA). The two administrations were separated by 14 days and were performed in the fasting state. Blood samples were obtained at 15 time points during the interval 0 - 120 h after administration. Rimantadine plasma concentrations were determined by gas chromatography with electron-capture detection. Results: The geometric mean concentration-time profiles of rimantadine after administration of the two formulations were superimposable. The following pharmacokinetic parameters refer to the geometric mean [exp(mean SD)] values for the test and reference formulations, respectively: C-max (ng/ml) 70.5 (60.0 - 82.7) vs. 70.0 (59.9 to 81.7), AUC(0-infinity) (ng x h/ml) 2872 (2224 to 3707) vs. 2849 (2195 - 3699), AUC(0-120h) 2744 (2184 - 3448) vs. 2712 (2138 - 3441), t(1/2) (it) 25.8 (20.1 - 33.0) vs. 25.7 (20.6 to 32.1). Median (range) t(max) (h) values were 4.5 (2.0 - 8.0) and 6.0 (10 - 8.0). parametric 90% confidence intervals for the expected mean percentage ratios (test/reference) of the pharmacokinetic variables were within the range of 97% to 105%. The median (91.1% confidence interval) difference in t(max) was -0.3 h (-2.0 -0.5). The point and interval estimates were identical when truncated AUCs (0-96 h, 0-72 h, 0-48 h and 0-24 h) were used in calculations. Conclusion: The two rimantadine formulations were equivalent in both the rate and extent of bioavailability and they were also well tolerated. This study confirms the findings of other studies showing that for immediate release formulations of drugs with long half-lives shortening the duration over which blood samples are collected improves the economics, is more ethical and does not impair the quality of data.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 184
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Bioequivalence study of two perindopril erbumine tablet formulations in healthy volunteers
    Setiawati, Effi
    Deniati, Siti Hawa
    Yunaidi, Danang Agung
    Handayani, Lucia Rat
    Santoso, Iwan Dwi
    Arland, Joan Aprilla
    Setiawati, Arini
    Lian, Lai Yeo
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2011, 61 (04): : 234 - 238
  • [42] Bioequivalence Study of Two Fixed Dose Combination Tablet Formulations of Lopinavir and Ritonavir in Healthy Volunteers
    Chachad, Siddarth
    Lulla, Amar
    Malhotra, Geena
    Purandare, Shrinivas
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2009, 59 (05): : 263 - 268
  • [43] A bioequivalence study of two memantine formulations in healthy Chinese male volunteers
    Deng, Ying
    Zhuang, Jialang
    Wu, Jingguo
    Chen, Jiangying
    Ding, Liang
    Wang, Xueding
    Huang, Lihui
    Zeng, Guixiong
    Chen, Jie
    Ma, Zhongfu
    Chen, Xiao
    Zhong, Guoping
    Huang, Min
    Zhao, Xianglan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 55 (10) : 832 - 838
  • [44] Comparative bioavailability of two capsule formulations of ofloxacin in healthy volunteers after a single dose administration
    Oliveira, CF
    Dias, HB
    Ribeiro, W
    Poli, A
    Peixoto, AP
    Moraes, MEA
    Moraes, MO
    Bezerra, FAF
    Moreno, H
    Muscará, MN
    de Nucci, G
    CLINICAL RESEARCH AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS, 1999, 16 (1-2) : 29 - 40
  • [45] Bioequivalence study of two clopidogrel film-coated tablet formulations in healthy volunteers
    Setiawati, Effi
    Yunaidi, Danang Agung
    Handayani, Lucia Rat
    Santoso, Iwan Dwi
    Setiawati, Mini
    Tjandrawinata, Raymond R.
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2011, 61 (12): : 681 - 684
  • [46] Bioequivalence of Two 6-Mercaptopurine Tablet Formulations in Healthy Fasting Chinese Volunteers
    Deng, Yaping
    Wang, Guohua
    Jiang, Guojun
    Song, Dandan
    Xu, Xian
    Zhao, Dandan
    Tan, Guojun
    Tan, Zijun
    Chen, Jian
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 12 (11): : 1099 - 1103
  • [47] Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two oral formulations of canagliflozin after single-dose administration in healthy Chinese subjects
    Hu, Wei
    Yang, Yaru
    Zhang, Qian
    Yang, Yang
    Zhou, Renpeng
    Lu, Chao
    Liu, Zeyuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 58 (01) : 57 - 66
  • [48] Bioequivalence study of two losartan formulations administered orally in healthy male volunteers
    Bienert, Agnieszka
    Brzezinski, Rafal
    Szalek, Edyta
    Dubai, Vitali
    Grzeskowiak, Edmund
    Dyderski, Stanislaw
    Drobnik, Leon
    Wolc, Anna
    Olejniczak-Rabinek, Magdalena
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2006, 56 (11): : 723 - 728
  • [49] Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence assessment of two formulations of tianeptine sodium in healthy male volunteers
    Zheng, Renhua
    Kim, Bo-Hyung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 52 (09) : 817 - 823
  • [50] Bioequivalence study of two favipiravir tablet formulations in healthy male subjects
    Saglam, Onursal
    Guney, Berrak
    Saraner, Nihal
    Sevici, Gamze
    Dogan-Kurtoglu, Emel
    Ulusoy, Merve G.
    Demiray, Gokce
    Nacak, Muradiye
    Erenmemisoglu, Aydin
    Ozbek, Mahmut
    Aytac, Peri
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 59 (05) : 409 - 416