Bioequivalence of two rimantadine tablet formulations in healthy male volunteers after single dose administration

被引:0
|
作者
Chládek, J [1 ]
Sispera, L [1 ]
Martínková, J [1 ]
Zaludek, B [1 ]
Sova, P [1 ]
Mièuda, S [1 ]
Grim, J [1 ]
Cermanová, J [1 ]
Zaludek, B [1 ]
Sova, P [1 ]
Franc, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pharmacol, CZ-50001 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
关键词
rimantadine; pharmacokinetics; bioequivalence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aim: The bioequivalence of two rimantadine tablet formulations was determined. Methods: The study was designed as a randomized, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers received a single 100 mg; dose of rimantadine hydrochloride as test (Rimantadin Lachema 100 tbl. obd., produced by Lachema, a.s., Brno, Czech Republic) and reference formulations (Flumadine 100 tbl. obd., produced by Forest Pharmaceuticals, St. Louis, USA). The two administrations were separated by 14 days and were performed in the fasting state. Blood samples were obtained at 15 time points during the interval 0 - 120 h after administration. Rimantadine plasma concentrations were determined by gas chromatography with electron-capture detection. Results: The geometric mean concentration-time profiles of rimantadine after administration of the two formulations were superimposable. The following pharmacokinetic parameters refer to the geometric mean [exp(mean SD)] values for the test and reference formulations, respectively: C-max (ng/ml) 70.5 (60.0 - 82.7) vs. 70.0 (59.9 to 81.7), AUC(0-infinity) (ng x h/ml) 2872 (2224 to 3707) vs. 2849 (2195 - 3699), AUC(0-120h) 2744 (2184 - 3448) vs. 2712 (2138 - 3441), t(1/2) (it) 25.8 (20.1 - 33.0) vs. 25.7 (20.6 to 32.1). Median (range) t(max) (h) values were 4.5 (2.0 - 8.0) and 6.0 (10 - 8.0). parametric 90% confidence intervals for the expected mean percentage ratios (test/reference) of the pharmacokinetic variables were within the range of 97% to 105%. The median (91.1% confidence interval) difference in t(max) was -0.3 h (-2.0 -0.5). The point and interval estimates were identical when truncated AUCs (0-96 h, 0-72 h, 0-48 h and 0-24 h) were used in calculations. Conclusion: The two rimantadine formulations were equivalent in both the rate and extent of bioavailability and they were also well tolerated. This study confirms the findings of other studies showing that for immediate release formulations of drugs with long half-lives shortening the duration over which blood samples are collected improves the economics, is more ethical and does not impair the quality of data.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 184
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bioequivalence study of two formulations (Sachet and tablet) of cefixime after single oral doses of 200mg in healthy male volunteers
    Evène, E
    Brault, M
    Manche, M
    Sibille, M
    Montay, G
    Durand, DV
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2001, 21 (04) : 287 - 294
  • [32] Bioequivalence Study of Two Fixed Dose Combination Tablet Formulations of Lopinavir and Ritonavir in Healthy Volunteers
    Chachad, Siddarth
    Lulla, Amar
    Malhotra, Geena
    Purandare, Shrinivas
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2009, 59 (05): : 263 - 268
  • [33] Bioequivalence of two formulations of daidzein administered in a single dose to healthy Chinese volunteers
    He, Jianchang
    Gu, Shenghua
    Zhang, Qing
    Feng, Enfu
    Li, Xingyi
    Xu, Guili
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2008, 58 (05): : 211 - 214
  • [34] Bioequivalence study of two perindopril erbumine tablet formulations in healthy volunteers
    Setiawati, Effi
    Deniati, Siti Hawa
    Yunaidi, Danang Agung
    Handayani, Lucia Rat
    Santoso, Iwan Dwi
    Arland, Joan Aprilla
    Setiawati, Arini
    Lian, Lai Yeo
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2011, 61 (04): : 234 - 238
  • [35] Bioequivalence evaluation of two strengths of risperidone tablet formulations in healthy volunteers
    Canovas, M.
    Delgadillo, J.
    Torres, F.
    Riba, N.
    Cebrecos, J.
    Pelagio, P.
    Cabre, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 47 (02) : 124 - 131
  • [36] Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of two tablet formulations of lovastatin in healthy volunteers
    Mignini, Fiorenzo
    Tomassoni, Daniele
    Streccioni, Valentino
    Traini, Enea
    Amenta, Francesco
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSION, 2008, 30 (02) : 95 - 108
  • [37] Bioequivalence study of two different tablet formulations of carvedilol in healthy volunteers
    Portolés, A
    Filipe, A
    Almeida, S
    Terleira, A
    Vallée, F
    Vargas, E
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2005, 55 (04): : 212 - 217
  • [38] Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Different Tablet Formulations of Tinidazole in Healthy Volunteers
    Mori Koono, Eunice Emiko
    Kano, Eunice Kazue
    Schramm, Simone Grigoleto
    dos Reis Serra, Cristina Helena
    Porta, Valentina
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2008, 58 (11): : 598 - 601
  • [39] Bioequivalence study of three ascorbic acid tablet formulations in healthy male volunteers
    Molina, PLG
    Ribeiro, W
    Moraes, LA
    Poli, A
    Abib, E
    Moreno, RA
    Leahey, W
    Moreno, H
    Muscará, MN
    de Nucci, G
    CLINICAL RESEARCH AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS, 1998, 15 (02) : 115 - 130
  • [40] Evaluation of average bioequivalence of two oral formulations of amiodarone hydrochloride after single administration to healthy volunteers
    Atanasova, I
    Terziivanov, D
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2001, 21 (06) : 423 - 428