Bioequivalence of two rimantadine tablet formulations in healthy male volunteers after single dose administration

被引:0
|
作者
Chládek, J [1 ]
Sispera, L [1 ]
Martínková, J [1 ]
Zaludek, B [1 ]
Sova, P [1 ]
Mièuda, S [1 ]
Grim, J [1 ]
Cermanová, J [1 ]
Zaludek, B [1 ]
Sova, P [1 ]
Franc, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pharmacol, CZ-50001 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
关键词
rimantadine; pharmacokinetics; bioequivalence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aim: The bioequivalence of two rimantadine tablet formulations was determined. Methods: The study was designed as a randomized, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers received a single 100 mg; dose of rimantadine hydrochloride as test (Rimantadin Lachema 100 tbl. obd., produced by Lachema, a.s., Brno, Czech Republic) and reference formulations (Flumadine 100 tbl. obd., produced by Forest Pharmaceuticals, St. Louis, USA). The two administrations were separated by 14 days and were performed in the fasting state. Blood samples were obtained at 15 time points during the interval 0 - 120 h after administration. Rimantadine plasma concentrations were determined by gas chromatography with electron-capture detection. Results: The geometric mean concentration-time profiles of rimantadine after administration of the two formulations were superimposable. The following pharmacokinetic parameters refer to the geometric mean [exp(mean SD)] values for the test and reference formulations, respectively: C-max (ng/ml) 70.5 (60.0 - 82.7) vs. 70.0 (59.9 to 81.7), AUC(0-infinity) (ng x h/ml) 2872 (2224 to 3707) vs. 2849 (2195 - 3699), AUC(0-120h) 2744 (2184 - 3448) vs. 2712 (2138 - 3441), t(1/2) (it) 25.8 (20.1 - 33.0) vs. 25.7 (20.6 to 32.1). Median (range) t(max) (h) values were 4.5 (2.0 - 8.0) and 6.0 (10 - 8.0). parametric 90% confidence intervals for the expected mean percentage ratios (test/reference) of the pharmacokinetic variables were within the range of 97% to 105%. The median (91.1% confidence interval) difference in t(max) was -0.3 h (-2.0 -0.5). The point and interval estimates were identical when truncated AUCs (0-96 h, 0-72 h, 0-48 h and 0-24 h) were used in calculations. Conclusion: The two rimantadine formulations were equivalent in both the rate and extent of bioavailability and they were also well tolerated. This study confirms the findings of other studies showing that for immediate release formulations of drugs with long half-lives shortening the duration over which blood samples are collected improves the economics, is more ethical and does not impair the quality of data.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 184
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bioequivalence study of two mirtazapine oral tablet formulations in healthy Chinese male volunteers
    Zheng, Li
    Yu, Qin
    Miao, Jia
    Xiang, Jin
    Xu, Nan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 50 (05) : 368 - 374
  • [22] Comparative study on the bioequivalence of two formulations of pioglitazone tablet in healthy Thai male volunteers
    Sripalakit, Pattana
    Maphanta, Sirada
    Neamhom, Penporn
    Saraphanchotiwitthaya, Aurasorn
    Polnok, Sanglar
    Yokubol, Dhirayudh
    DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY, 2007, 33 (12) : 1362 - 1368
  • [23] Evaluation of the bioequivalence and pharmacokinetics of two tablet formulations of isosorbide-5-mononitrate after single oral administration in healthy volunteers
    Niopas, I
    Daftsios, AC
    Nikolaidis, N
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2002, 52 (03): : 182 - 186
  • [24] Comparative bioavailability of two sertraline tablet formulations after single-dose administration in healthy Thai volunteers
    Tassaneeyakul, W.
    Kanchanawat, S.
    Gaysonsiri, D.
    Vannaprasath, S.
    Paupairoj, R.
    Kittiwattanagul, K.
    Tippabhotla, S. K.
    Khuroo, A.
    Panigrahy, B. K.
    Reyar, S.
    Monif, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 46 (03) : 151 - 156
  • [25] Bioequivalence Study of Two Tablet Formulations of Ramipril in Healthy Volunteers
    Allegrini, Alessandro
    Nuzzo, Loredana
    Zucchelli, Mirco
    Tavella-Scaringi, Andrea
    Bucci, Marco
    Pavone, Daniele
    Toniato, Elena
    Mezzetti, Andrea
    Martinotti, Stefano
    Bonani, Stefano
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2009, 59 (08): : 392 - 396
  • [26] Evaluation of the bioequivalence and pharmacokinetics of two formulations of secnidazole after single oral administration in healthy volunteers
    Zhu, De Qiu
    Hu, Kai Li
    Tao, Wei Xing
    Feng, Liang
    Duan, Hu
    Jiang, Xin Guo
    Chen, Jun
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2007, 57 (11): : 723 - 726
  • [27] Investigation of the bioequivalence of two lansoprazole formulations in healthy Chinese volunteers after a single oral administration
    Bian, Yuhai
    Zhong, Ming
    ARTIFICIAL CELLS NANOMEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 45 (07) : 1425 - 1430
  • [28] Evaluation of the bioequivalence and pharmacokinetics of two formulations of rizatriptan after single oral administration in healthy volunteers
    Chen, J
    Jiang, WM
    Xie, YL
    Jin, L
    Mei, N
    Jiang, XG
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2005, 55 (07): : 355 - 358
  • [29] A bioavailability/bioequivalence study of two oral lansoprazole formulations after single administration to healthy volunteers
    Jovanovic, D
    Kilibarda, V
    Maksimovic, M
    PHARMAZIE, 2001, 56 (10): : 800 - 802
  • [30] Bioequivalence study of two formulations (sachet and tablet) of cefixime after single oral doses of 200mg in healthy male volunteers
    Evène E.
    Brault M.
    Manche M.
    Sibille M.
    Montay G.
    Vital Durand D.
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2001, 21 (4) : 287 - 294