Bioequivalence of two rimantadine tablet formulations in healthy male volunteers after single dose administration

被引:0
|
作者
Chládek, J [1 ]
Sispera, L [1 ]
Martínková, J [1 ]
Zaludek, B [1 ]
Sova, P [1 ]
Mièuda, S [1 ]
Grim, J [1 ]
Cermanová, J [1 ]
Zaludek, B [1 ]
Sova, P [1 ]
Franc, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pharmacol, CZ-50001 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
关键词
rimantadine; pharmacokinetics; bioequivalence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aim: The bioequivalence of two rimantadine tablet formulations was determined. Methods: The study was designed as a randomized, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers received a single 100 mg; dose of rimantadine hydrochloride as test (Rimantadin Lachema 100 tbl. obd., produced by Lachema, a.s., Brno, Czech Republic) and reference formulations (Flumadine 100 tbl. obd., produced by Forest Pharmaceuticals, St. Louis, USA). The two administrations were separated by 14 days and were performed in the fasting state. Blood samples were obtained at 15 time points during the interval 0 - 120 h after administration. Rimantadine plasma concentrations were determined by gas chromatography with electron-capture detection. Results: The geometric mean concentration-time profiles of rimantadine after administration of the two formulations were superimposable. The following pharmacokinetic parameters refer to the geometric mean [exp(mean SD)] values for the test and reference formulations, respectively: C-max (ng/ml) 70.5 (60.0 - 82.7) vs. 70.0 (59.9 to 81.7), AUC(0-infinity) (ng x h/ml) 2872 (2224 to 3707) vs. 2849 (2195 - 3699), AUC(0-120h) 2744 (2184 - 3448) vs. 2712 (2138 - 3441), t(1/2) (it) 25.8 (20.1 - 33.0) vs. 25.7 (20.6 to 32.1). Median (range) t(max) (h) values were 4.5 (2.0 - 8.0) and 6.0 (10 - 8.0). parametric 90% confidence intervals for the expected mean percentage ratios (test/reference) of the pharmacokinetic variables were within the range of 97% to 105%. The median (91.1% confidence interval) difference in t(max) was -0.3 h (-2.0 -0.5). The point and interval estimates were identical when truncated AUCs (0-96 h, 0-72 h, 0-48 h and 0-24 h) were used in calculations. Conclusion: The two rimantadine formulations were equivalent in both the rate and extent of bioavailability and they were also well tolerated. This study confirms the findings of other studies showing that for immediate release formulations of drugs with long half-lives shortening the duration over which blood samples are collected improves the economics, is more ethical and does not impair the quality of data.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 184
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bioequivalence evaluation of two sertraline tablet formulations in healthy male volunteers after a single dose administration
    Zhu, CJ
    Wu, JF
    Qu, ZW
    Chen, LM
    Zhang, JT
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 37 (03) : 120 - 124
  • [2] Bioequivalence study of two meloxicam tablet formulations after single-dose administration in healthy Thai male volunteers
    Tangsucharit, P.
    Kampan, J.
    Kanjanawart, S.
    Gaysonsiri, D.
    Vannaprasaht, S.
    Tiamkao, S.
    Phunikhom, K.
    Simasathiansophon, S.
    Puapairoj, P.
    Tassaneeyakul, W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 47 (10) : 638 - 642
  • [3] Bioequivalence of two aceclofenac tablet formulations after a single oral dose to healthy male Korean volunteers
    Kim, YG
    Lee, YJ
    Kim, HJ
    Lee, SD
    Kwon, JW
    Kim, WB
    Shim, CK
    Lee, MG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 39 (02) : 83 - 88
  • [4] Bioequivalence of two tablet formulations of atenolol after single oral administration in healthy volunteers
    Niopas, I
    Daftsios, AC
    Xanthakis, I
    Nikolaidis, N
    Njau, SN
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2000, 50 (03): : E243 - E247
  • [5] Comparative bioavailability of two atenolol tablet formulations in healthy male volunteers after a single dose administration
    Martins, ML
    Pierossi, MA
    Moraes, LA
    Ribeiro, W
    Abbib, E
    Mendes, GB
    Poli, A
    DeNucci, G
    Muscara, MN
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1997, 35 (08) : 324 - 328
  • [6] Bioequivalence assessment of ambroxol tablet after a single oral dose administration to healthy male volunteers
    Lee, HJ
    Joung, SK
    Kim, YG
    Yoo, JY
    Han, SB
    PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 49 (01) : 93 - 98
  • [7] Evaluation of the bioequivalence and pharmacokinetics of two lisinopril tablet formulations after single oral administration in healthy volunteers
    Georgarakis, M
    Tsakalof, A
    Zougrou, F
    Kontopoulos, G
    Tsiptsios, I
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2004, 54 (01): : 15 - 19
  • [8] Evaluation of the Bioequivalence of Two Tablet Formulations of Enalapril after Single Oral Administration to Chinese Healthy Volunteers
    Song, Ji-jun
    Gao, Jian
    Shi, Sheng-li
    Tian, Dong-dong
    Yin, Wei-yong
    LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY, 2014, 33 (06): : 942 - 947
  • [9] Evaluation of the bioequivalence of two tablet formulations of enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide after single oral administration to healthy volunteers
    Niopas, L
    Daftsios, AC
    Nikolaidis, N
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2004, 54 (03): : 160 - 165
  • [10] Bioequivalence of two tablet formulations of helicidum adminstered in single dose to healthy Chinese volunteers
    Hao, Kun
    Cao, Yan Guang
    Zhao, Ya Nan
    Mao, Guo Guang
    Liu, Xiao Quan
    Wang, Guang Ji
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2007, 57 (08): : 522 - 525