Embedding electronic patient-reported outcome measures into routine care for patients with stage III MELanoma (ePROMs-MEL): protocol for a prospective, longitudinal, mixed-methods pilot study

被引:2
|
作者
Dempsey, Kathy [1 ,2 ]
Saw, Robyn [2 ,3 ]
Bartula, Iris [3 ]
Lo, Serigne [3 ]
Lawn, Craig [3 ]
Pennington, Thomas [3 ]
Spillane, Andrew [2 ,3 ]
Boyle, Frances [2 ,3 ]
Dong, Skye [3 ]
Dieng, Mbathio [1 ,2 ]
Milne, Donna [4 ]
Seaman, Linda [3 ]
Saks, Dina [3 ]
Lai-Kwon, Julia [3 ]
Thompson, Jake Robert [3 ]
Morton, Rachael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, NHMRC Clin Trials Ctr, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Melanoma Inst Australia, Wollstonecraft, NSW, Australia
[4] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 12期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Quality in health care; MENTAL HEALTH; Dermatological tumours; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Organisation of health services; EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION; RECOGNITION; DEPRESSION; QUALITY; PRO;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066852
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe benefits of patient-reported feedback, using questionnaires that allow patients to report how they feel and function without any interpretation from healthcare professionals, are well established. However, patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are not routinely collected in patients with melanoma in Australia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of implementing electronic PROMs (ePROMs) into routine care from the perspectives of patients with stage III melanoma and their treating clinical team.Methods and analysisA minimum of 50 patients and 5 clinicians will be recruited to this prospective, longitudinal pilot study (ePROMs-MELanoma). The study uses a mixed-methods approach (quantitative PROMs questionnaires and end-of-study surveys with qualitative interviews) and commenced in May 2021 in surgical and medical melanoma clinics at two sites in metropolitan Sydney, Australia. The primary outcomes are measures of feasibility and acceptability, comprising descriptive questionnaire completion statistics, and proportion of patients who reported that these PROMs were easy to complete and measured items they considered important. Clinician and clinic staff views will be canvassed on the appropriateness of these PROMs for their patients, change in referral practice and uptake and incorporation into routine practice. Secondary aims include measurement of improvements in patients' emotional and physical health and well-being, and utility of real-time data capture and clinician feedback. All participants will complete the Distress Thermometer and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires in the clinic using a tablet computer at baseline and two to three subsequent follow-up appointments. Participants who report a score of 4 or higher on the Distress Thermometer will be triaged to complete an additional three questionnaires: the QLQ-C30, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale and Melanoma Concerns Questionnaire-28. Results will be generated in real time; patients with psychosocial distress or poor quality of life will discuss possible referral to appropriate allied health services with their clinician. Thematic analysis of interviews will be conducted.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval obtained from St Vincent's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee on 19 September 2019 (2019/ETH10558), with amendments approved on 8 June 2022. Patient consent is obtained electronically prior to questionnaire commencement. Dissemination strategies will include publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at international conferences, tailored presentations for clinical societies and government bodies, organisational reporting through multidisciplinary meetings and research symposia for local clinicians and clinic staff, and more informal, lay reports and presentations for consumer melanoma representative bodies and patient participants and their families.Trial registration numberACTRN12620001149954.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Enhancing Clinicians' Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Outpatient Care:Mixed Methods Study
    van Engen, Veerle
    Bonfrer, Igna
    Ahaus, Kees
    Den Hollander-Ardon, Monique
    Peters, Ingrid
    Buljac-Samardzic, Martina
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26 : e60306
  • [2] Creation of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure platform Voxe: a mixed methods study protocol in paediatric solid organ transplantation
    Anthony, Samantha J.
    Pol, Sarah J.
    Lin, Jia
    Barwick, Melanie
    Brudno, Michael
    Manase, Dorin
    Parekh, Rulan Savita
    Silva, Amanda
    Stinson, Jennifer
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (10):
  • [3] Feasibility and Acceptability of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Tool in Routine Outpatient Diabetes Care: Mixed Methods Formative Pilot Study
    Skovlund, Soren E.
    Troelsen, Lise Havbaek
    Noergaard, Lise Mellergaard
    Pietraszek, Anna
    Jakobsen, Poul Erik
    Ejskjaer, Niels
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2021, 5 (11)
  • [4] Feasibility and accessibility of electronic patient-reported outcome measures using a smartphone during routine chemotherapy: a pilot study
    Bae, Woo Kyun
    Kwon, Jihyun
    Lee, Hyun Woo
    Lee, Sang-Cheol
    Song, Eun-Kee
    Shim, Hyeok
    Ryu, Keun Ho
    Song, Jemin
    Seo, Sungbo
    Yang, Yaewon
    Park, Jong-Hyock
    Lee, Ki Hyeong
    Han, Hye Sook
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2018, 26 (11) : 3721 - 3728
  • [5] Discussing results of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients and healthcare professionals in routine dialysis care: a qualitative study
    van der Willik, Esmee M.
    Milders, Jet
    Bart, Johannes A. J.
    Bos, Willem Jan W.
    van Ittersum, Frans J.
    ten Dam, Marc A. G. J.
    Hemmelder, Marc H.
    Dekker, Friedo W.
    Meuleman, Yvette
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [6] Comparison of important factors to patients recovering from pulmonary embolism and items covered in patient-reported outcome measures: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Ingemann-Molden, Stian
    Caspersen, Christina Krogner
    Rolving, Nanna
    Hojen, Anette Arbjerg
    Klok, Frederikus A.
    Grove, Erik L.
    Brocki, Barbara Cristina
    Andreasen, Jane
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2024, 233 : 69 - 81
  • [7] Preparing for the spread of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection from primary care to community pharmacy: a mixed-methods study
    Adeoye-Olatunde, Omolola A.
    Curran, Geoffrey M.
    Jaynes, Heather A.
    Hillman, Lisa A.
    Sangasubana, Nisaratana
    Chewning, Betty A.
    Kreling, David H.
    Schommer, Jon C.
    Murawski, Matthew M.
    Perkins, Susan M.
    Snyder, Margie E.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 3 (01):
  • [8] Patient-reported outcome measures for monitoring primary care patients with depression (PROMDEP): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Kendrick, Tony
    Moore, Michael
    Leydon, Geraldine M.
    Stuart, Beth
    Geraghty, Adam W. A.
    Yao, Guiqing
    Lewis, Glyn
    Griffiths, Gareth
    May, Carl
    Dewar-Haggart, Rachel
    Williams, Samantha J.
    Zhu, Shihua
    Dowrick, Christopher
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [9] State-wide implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in specialized outpatient palliative care teams (ELSAH): A mixed-methods evaluation and implications for their sustainable use
    Seipp, Hannah
    Haasenritter, Joerg
    Hach, Michaela
    Becker, Dorothee
    Schuetze, Dania
    Engler, Jennifer
    Boesner, Stefan
    Kuss, Katrin
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [10] The use of patient-reported outcome measures by healthcare professionals in specialized asthma management centers in French-speaking Belgium: A mixed-methods study
    Louis, Gilles
    Voz, Bernard
    Guillaume, Michele
    Kirkove, Delphine
    Petre, Benoit
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL ALLERGY, 2023, 13 (05)