Measuring limb length discrepancy using pelvic radiographs: the most reproducible method

被引:26
作者
Heaver, Catriona [1 ]
St Mart, Jean-Pierre [1 ]
Nightingale, Peter [2 ]
Sinha, Aabha [3 ]
Davis, Edward T. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Russells Hall Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Dudley DY1 2HQ, W Midlands, England
[2] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Wolfson Comp Lab, Birmingham B15 2TH, W Midlands, England
[3] Russells Hall Hosp, Dept Radiol, Dudley DY1 2HQ, W Midlands, England
[4] Royal Orthopaed Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Primary total hip arthroplasty; Pelvic radiograph; Limb length discrepancy; EQUALIZATION; INEQUALITY;
D O I
10.5301/hipint.5000042
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Leg length inequality following total hip replacement remains common. In an effort to reduce this occurrence, surgeons undertake pre-operative measurements, templating and use various forms of intraoperative measurements, including computer navigation. This study aims to delineate which measurement technique is most appropriate for measuring leg length inequality from a pelvic radiograph. Three observers took a total of 9600 measurements from 100 pelvic radiographs. Four lines were constructed on each of the radiographs, bisecting the acetabular teardrops, ischial spines, inferior sacroiliac joint and inferior obturator foramen. Measurements were taken from these lines to the most prominent medial point on the lesser trochanter and to the tip of the greater trochanter. The effect of pelvic positioning was also assessed using radiographs of a synthetic pelvis and femur. Intra-observer and inter-observer variability were calculated. Measuring from the inferior aspect of the ischial tuberosities to the most prominent medial point on the lesser trochanter appears to be the best method for measuring LLD however large error margin still exist, even when corrected for magnification errors.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 394
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Functional problems and treatment solutions after total hip arthroplasty [J].
Bhave, Anil ;
Marker, David R. ;
Seyler, Thorsten M. ;
Ulrich, Slif D. ;
Plate, Johannes F. ;
Mont, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2007, 22 (06) :116-124
[2]  
Bose WJ, 2000, ORTHOPEDICS, V23, P433
[3]   Leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty [J].
Clark, CR ;
Huddleston, HD ;
Schoch, EP ;
Thomas, BJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2006, 14 (01) :38-45
[4]  
Gates H S 3rd, 1989, J Arthroplasty, V4, P347, DOI 10.1016/S0883-5403(89)80036-1
[5]  
GOODMAN S B, 1990, Contemporary Orthopaedics, V20, P505
[6]  
Haber M., 2005, Journal of Data Science, V3, P69
[7]  
Horsfield D, 1986, Radiography, V52, P223
[8]   LIMB-LENGTH DISCREPANCY MEASURED WITH COMPUTERIZED AXIAL TOMOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT [J].
HUURMAN, WW ;
JACOBSEN, FS ;
ANDERSON, JC ;
CHU, WK .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1987, 69A (05) :699-705
[9]   Measurement of limb length inequality - Comparison of clinical methods with orthoradiography in 190 children [J].
Lampe, HIH ;
Swierstra, BA ;
Diepstraten, AFM .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 67 (03) :242-244
[10]   Should full-length standing anteroposterior radiographs replace the scanogram for measurement of limb length discrepancy? [J].
Machen, MS ;
Stevens, PM .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2005, 14 (01) :30-37