Disgorging the Fruits of Historical Wrongdoing

被引:49
作者
Goodin, Robert E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
RESTITUTION; JUSTICE; DISGORGEMENT; APOLOGIES; STATE;
D O I
10.1017/S0003055413000233
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
There are many different ways of responding to wrongdoing: person-centered or object-centered, victim-centered or perpetrator-centered, and fault-oriented or not. Among these approaches, requiring innocent beneficiaries to disgorge the fruits of historical wrongdoings of others is attractive because it is informationally the least demanding. Although that approach is perhaps not ideal, at least it is feasible where other responses are not, and doing something is better than doing nothing in response to grievous historical wrongdoing. Depending on circumstances, disgorgement can be in whole or in part, in kind or in cash. Even without the full information that disgorgement itself requires, general redistributive taxation might be justified as a tolerably close approximation.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 491
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Allen RobertC., 1992, Enclosure and the Yeoman
[2]  
American Law Institute (ALI), 1962, MOD PEN COD
[3]  
[Anonymous], ECN4SUB2199723 UN EC
[4]  
[Anonymous], J ETHICS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, UNJUST ENRICHMENT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1991, NOMOS 33 COMPENSATOR
[7]  
[Anonymous], SINS NATION RITUAL A
[8]  
Barkan Elazar., 2000, THE GUILT OF NATIONS
[9]   RESTITUTION - NEW PARADIGM OF CRIMINAL-JUSTICE [J].
BARNETT, RE .
ETHICS, 1977, 87 (04) :279-301
[10]  
Birks P., 1995, LAUNDERING TRACING, P289