Urinary-Cell mRNA Profile and Acute Cellular Rejection in Kidney Allografts

被引:259
作者
Suthanthiran, Manikkam [1 ]
Schwartz, Joseph E. [4 ]
Ding, Ruchuang [1 ]
Abecassis, Michael [5 ]
Dadhania, Darshana [1 ]
Samstein, Benjamin [2 ]
Knechtle, Stuart J. [7 ]
Friedewald, John [5 ]
Becker, Yolanda T. [6 ]
Sharma, Vijay K. [1 ]
Williams, Nikki M. [8 ]
Chang, Christina S. [1 ]
Hoang, Christine [1 ]
Muthukumar, Thangamani [1 ]
August, Phyllis [1 ]
Keslar, Karen S. [9 ]
Fairchild, Robert L. [9 ]
Hricik, Donald E. [10 ]
Heeger, Peter S. [3 ]
Han, Leiya [11 ]
Liu, Jun [11 ]
Riggs, Michael [12 ]
Ikle, David N. [12 ]
Bridges, Nancy D. [8 ]
Shaked, Abraham [13 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med Coll, New York, NY USA
[2] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[4] SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[6] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[7] Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[8] NIAID, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[9] Cleveland Clin, Cleveland, OH USA
[10] Univ Hosp Case Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH USA
[11] Pharmaceut Prod Dev, Wilmington, NC USA
[12] Rho Fed Syst, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[13] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
RENAL-ALLOGRAFT; PREDICTION; MODELS; TRANSPLANTATION; CLASSIFICATION; CURVE;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa1215555
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The standard test for the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplants is the renal biopsy. Noninvasive tests would be preferable. METHODS We prospectively collected 4300 urine specimens from 485 kidney-graft recipients from day 3 through month 12 after transplantation. Messenger RNA (mRNA) levels were measured in urinary cells and correlated with allograft-rejection status with the use of logistic regression. RESULTS A three-gene signature of 18S ribosomal (rRNA)-normalized measures of CD3 epsilon mRNA and interferon-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) mRNA, and 18S rRNA discriminated between biopsy specimens showing acute cellular rejection and those not showing rejection (area under the curve [AUC], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 0.91; P<0.001 by receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis). The cross-validation estimate of the AUC was 0.83 by bootstrap resampling, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated good fit (P = 0.77). In an external-validation data set, the AUC was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.86; P<0.001) and did not differ significantly from the AUC in our primary data set (P = 0.13). The signature distinguished acute cellular rejection from acute antibody-mediated rejection and borderline rejection (AUC, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.89; P<0.001). It also distinguished patients who received anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies from those who received T-cell-depleting antibodies (P<0.001) and was diagnostic of acute cellular rejection in both groups. Urinary tract infection did not affect the signature (P = 0.69). The average trajectory of the signature in repeated urine samples remained below the diagnostic threshold for acute cellular rejection in the group of patients with no rejection, but in the group with rejection, there was a sharp rise during the weeks before the biopsy showing rejection (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS A molecular signature of CD3 epsilon mRNA, IP-10 mRNA, and 18S rRNA levels in urinary cells appears to be diagnostic and prognostic of acute cellular rejection in kidney allografts.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 31
页数:12
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] RISK-FACTORS FOR CHRONIC REJECTION IN RENAL-ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS
    ALMOND, PS
    MATAS, A
    GILLINGHAM, K
    DUNN, DL
    PAYNE, WD
    GORES, P
    GRUESSNER, R
    NAJARIAN, JS
    FERGUSON
    PAUL
    SCHAFFER
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1993, 55 (04) : 752 - 757
  • [2] Noninvasive prediction of organ graft rejection and outcome using gene expression patterns
    Anglicheau, Dany
    Suthanthiran, Manikkam
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 86 (02) : 192 - 199
  • [3] Bootstrap methods for developing predictive models
    Austin, PC
    Tu, JV
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2004, 58 (02) : 131 - 137
  • [4] Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction
    Cook, Nancy R.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (07) : 928 - 935
  • [5] International variation in the interpretation of renal transplant biopsies: Report of the CERTPAP Project
    Furness, PN
    Taub, N
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 60 (05) : 1998 - 2012
  • [6] Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996.
    Hariharan, S
    Johnson, CP
    Bresnahan, BA
    Taranto, SE
    McIntosh, MJ
    Stablein, D
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (09) : 605 - 612
  • [7] Harrell FE, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P361, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-4
  • [9] The management of the failed renal allograft: An enigma with potential consequences
    Langone, AJ
    Chuang, P
    [J]. SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS, 2005, 18 (03) : 185 - 187
  • [10] A solution for the most basic optimization problem associated with an ROC curve
    Le, Chap T.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 15 (06) : 571 - 584