The contribution of healthcare smart homes to older peoples' wellbeing: A new conceptual framework

被引:21
作者
Creaney, Rachel [1 ,2 ]
Reid, Louise [1 ]
Currie, Margaret [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Andrews, Sch Geog & Sustainable Dev, Irvine Bldg, St Andrews KY16 9AL, Scotland
[2] James Hutton Inst, Social Econ & Geog Sci, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland
来源
WELLBEING SPACE AND SOCIETY | 2021年 / 2卷
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Ageing-in-place; Healthcare smart homes; Older people; Caring networks; Wellbeing; AGING IN-PLACE; TECHNOLOGY; AGE; AUTONOMY; EMPOWERMENT; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; MEANINGS; ADOPTION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.wss.2021.100031
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Healthcare smart homes (HSH) are promoted as a possible solution in response to demographic ageing. They encourage ageing-in-place by enabling residents to remain in their own homes by utilising smart technologies to allow safe and independent living. However, the degree to which they currently encourage relational wellbeing of residents and their wider networks is novel. This critical narrative review provides a theoretical contribution to the growing body of social science literature around the impacts of HSH living. It highlights the potential links between HSH living and impacts on relational wellbeing of residents and wider networks. Arguing that existing HSH literature has often focused on single technology devices and the perceived benefits of HSH living by technology and home developers, rather than lived experiences of HSH residents, it presents a new conceptual framework, around which HSH should be promoted, focussing on individual residents and their caring networks, rather than technological possibilities. Specifically, the new framework highlights the importance of HSH resident wellbeing which we suggest may be maintained and enhanced through ensuring a sense of home, relational rather than independent living, accounting for potential spatial inequalities and the importance of an appropriate use of language. This paper aims to generate discussion around better understandings of what it means to live with healthcare technologies at home, and how these may act to (dis)empower those wishing to age-in-place or otherwise.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]   Where is grandma? Home telecare, good aging and the domestication of later life [J].
Aceros, Juan C. ;
Pols, Jeannette ;
Domenech, Miquel .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 93 :102-111
[2]   Energy evaluation of residential buildings: Performance gap analysis incorporating uncertainties in the evaluation methods [J].
Allard, Ingrid ;
Olofsson, Thomas ;
Nair, Gireesh .
BUILDING SIMULATION, 2018, 11 (04) :725-737
[3]  
Amery Jean., 1994, AGING
[4]   A review of smart homes in healthcare [J].
Amiribesheli, Mohsen ;
Benmansour, Asma ;
Bouchachia, Abdelhamid .
JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2015, 6 (04) :495-517
[5]   Beyond Components of Wellbeing: The Effects of Relational and Situated Assemblage [J].
Atkinson, Sarah .
TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY, 2013, 32 (02) :137-144
[6]   Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart [J].
Barad, Karen .
PARALLAX, 2014, 20 (03) :168-187
[7]   Healthcare in the Smart Home: A Study of Past, Present and Future [J].
Bennett, Jamie ;
Rokas, Osvaldas ;
Chen, Liming .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (05)
[8]   DIY gerontechnology: circumventing mismatched technologies and bureaucratic procedure by creating care technologies of one's own [J].
Bergschold, Jenny M. ;
Neven, Louis ;
Peine, Alexander .
SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2020, 42 (02) :232-246
[9]  
Bevir M., 2016, Governmentality after neoliberalism. Governmentality After Neoliberalism
[10]  
Brintazolli G., 2018, Technology, Care and A Sense of Home