Romantic Attachment and Relationship Functioning in Same-Sex Couples

被引:38
作者
Mohr, Jonathan J. [1 ]
Selterman, Dylan [1 ]
Fassinger, Ruth E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Psychol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Counseling & Personnel Serv, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
same-sex couples; lesbian; gay; and bisexual; attachment; romantic relationships; RELATIONSHIP QUALITY; ADULT ATTACHMENT; WORKING MODELS; GAY MALES; CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS; MINORITY STRESS; CONFLICT; STYLE; ORIENTATION; DIMENSIONS;
D O I
10.1037/a0030994
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The present study was designed to investigate links between dimensions of romantic attachment and relationship functioning in a cross-sectional sample of people in same-sex relationships, with the goals of replicating basic findings from research on heterosexual couples and advancing understanding of unique issues faced by same-sex couples. The sample included 274 female couples, 188 male couples, 34 women whose female partners did not participate, and 39 men whose male partners did not participate. Participants were recruited from geographically diverse regions of the United States and Canada and provided data by responding to pencil-and-paper surveys. Attachment insecurity in both self and partner were linked with poor relationship functioning across a range of variables (satisfaction, commitment, trust, communication, problem intensity). The pattern of results was identical for women and men, but the effects were stronger in male couples for some associations between attachment variables and indices of positive relationship functioning. Monogamy was positively associated with relationship quality only when participants or their partners reported moderate or high levels of attachment anxiety. Contrary to hypothesis, attachment did not moderate links between minority stressors and relationship functioning.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 82
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[41]  
Peplau L.A., 1983, Changing Boundaries: Gender Roles and Sexual Behavior, P226
[42]  
Peplau LA, 2004, HANDBOOK OF SEXUALITY IN CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS, P349
[43]  
Peplau Letitia., 2000, Close Relationships: A Sourcebook, P111, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781452220437.N9
[44]   The close relationships of lesbians and gay men [J].
Peplau, Letitia Anne ;
Fingerhut, Adam W. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 58 :405-424
[45]  
Pietromonaco P.R., 2004, ADULT ATTACHMENT, P267
[46]   TRUST IN CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS [J].
REMPEL, JK ;
HOLMES, JG ;
ZANNA, MP .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 49 (01) :95-112
[47]   Relationship history and relationship attitudes in gay males and lesbians: attachment style and gender differences [J].
Ridge, SR ;
Feeney, JA .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 32 (06) :848-859
[48]   Adult romantic relationships as contexts of human development: A multimethod comparison of same-sex couples with opposite-sex dating, engaged, and married dyads [J].
Roisman, Glenn I. ;
Clausell, Eric ;
Holland, Ashley ;
Fortuna, Keren ;
Elieff, Chryle .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 44 (01) :91-101
[49]   Best Practices for Missing Data Management in Counseling Psychology [J].
Schlomer, Gabriel L. ;
Bauman, Sheri ;
Card, Noel A. .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 57 (01) :1-10
[50]   Are men universally more dismissing than women?: Gender differences in romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions [J].
Schmitt, DP ;
Alcalay, L ;
Allensworth, M ;
Allik, J ;
Ault, L ;
Austers, I ;
Bennett, KL ;
Bianchi, G ;
Boholst, F ;
Cunen, MAB ;
Braekman, J ;
Brainerd, EG ;
Caral, LGA ;
Caron, G ;
Casullo, MM ;
Cunningham, M ;
Daibo, I ;
De Backer, C ;
De Souza, E ;
Diaz-Loving, R ;
Diniz, G ;
Durkin, K ;
Echegaray, M ;
Eremsoy, E ;
Euler, EA ;
Falzon, R ;
Fisher, ML ;
Foley, D ;
Fowler, R ;
Fry, DP ;
Fry, S ;
Ghayur, MA ;
Giri, VN ;
Golden, DL ;
Grammer, K ;
Grimaldi, L ;
Halberstadt, J ;
Haque, S ;
Herrera, D ;
Hertel, J ;
Hitchell, A ;
Hoffmann, H ;
Hooper, D ;
Hradilekova, Z ;
Hudek-Kene-Evi, J ;
Huffcuff, A ;
Jaafar, J ;
Jankauskaite, M ;
Kabangu-Stahel, H ;
Kardum, I .
PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2003, 10 (03) :307-331