THE END OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES (AS WE KNEW IT)

被引:0
作者
Owen, Suzanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Trinity Univ, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Religious Studies; phenomenology; realism; critical religion;
D O I
10.1558/imre.41526
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
Fitzgerald's The Ideology of Religious Studies was published the year before I started my Master's degree at the University of Edinburgh and was brought to my attention by James Cox, my supervisor. It led me to question everything I had learned as a Religious Studies undergraduate and sparked my first essay (in 2001), titled "Religious Studies: What is it?" In it, I had seen the problem of "what is it?" as a methodological issue as well as a definitional one and predicted an expansion of Religious Studies along phenomenological lines. Today, while still recognising colleagues' fears that Fitzgerald's book undermines the study of religion, I rather see his critique as making the study of religion more important than ever, though not in the way I had described in my 2001 essay. My paper will revisit those early responses to the book (mine and others'), asking if we are indeed seeing the end of Religious Studies (as we knew it), and show how Fitzgerald's critique has instead opened up and transformed the study of religion, at least in my own research and teaching.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 330
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Allen Charlotte., 1996, LINGUA FRANCA, V6, P30
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, DAILY MAIL
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, RELIG CATEGORY GOVER
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2008, DISCOURSES CIVILITY
  • [5] Arnal WilliamE., 2000, GUIDE STUDY RELIG, P21
  • [6] Cotter C. R., 2020, The Critical Study of Non-Religion: Discourse, Identification and Locality
  • [7] A Response to Kevin Schilbrack
    Fitzgerald, Timothy
    [J]. METHOD & THEORY IN THE STUDY OF RELIGION, 2013, 25 (01) : 101 - 106
  • [8] Fitzgerald Timothy., 2000, IDEOLOGY RELIG STUDI
  • [9] Fitzgerald Timothy., 2007, RELIG SECULAR HIST C, P1
  • [10] Fitzgerald Timothy, 1999, COUNCIL SOC STUDY RE, V28, P39