共 50 条
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Technology Assessment
被引:220
作者:
Thokala, Praueen
[1
]
Duenas, Alejandra
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Sheffield, HEDS, ScHARR, Sheffield S1 4DA, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Sch Management LEM CNRS, IESEG, Paris, France
关键词:
decision making;
health economics;
health technology assessment;
multiple criteria decision analysis;
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS;
COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
MARGINAL ANALYSIS PBMA;
RESOURCE-ALLOCATION;
CARE;
CHOICE;
RANKING;
SUPPORT;
SYSTEM;
MODEL;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.015
中图分类号:
F [经济];
学科分类号:
02 ;
摘要:
Objectives: Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) has been suggested by some researchers as a method to capture the benefits beyond quality adjusted life-years in a transparent and consistent manner. The objectives of this article were to analyze the possible application of MCDA approaches in health technology assessment and to describe their relative advantages and disadvantages. Methods: This article begins with an introduction to the most common types of MCDA models and a critical review of state-of-the-art methods for incorporating multiple criteria in health technology assessment. An overview of MCDA is provided and is compared against the current UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence health technology appraisal process. A generic MCDA modeling approach is described, and the different MCDA modeling approaches are applied to a hypothetical case study. Results: A comparison of the different MCDA approaches is provided, and the generic issues that need consideration before the application of MCDA in health technology assessment are examined. Conclusions: There are general practical issues that might arise from using an MCDA approach, and it is suggested that appropriate care be taken to ensure the success of MCDA techniques in the appraisal process.
引用
收藏
页码:1172 / 1181
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条