Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Technology Assessment

被引:221
作者
Thokala, Praueen [1 ]
Duenas, Alejandra [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, HEDS, ScHARR, Sheffield S1 4DA, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Sch Management LEM CNRS, IESEG, Paris, France
关键词
decision making; health economics; health technology assessment; multiple criteria decision analysis; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; MARGINAL ANALYSIS PBMA; RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; CARE; CHOICE; RANKING; SUPPORT; SYSTEM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.015
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) has been suggested by some researchers as a method to capture the benefits beyond quality adjusted life-years in a transparent and consistent manner. The objectives of this article were to analyze the possible application of MCDA approaches in health technology assessment and to describe their relative advantages and disadvantages. Methods: This article begins with an introduction to the most common types of MCDA models and a critical review of state-of-the-art methods for incorporating multiple criteria in health technology assessment. An overview of MCDA is provided and is compared against the current UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence health technology appraisal process. A generic MCDA modeling approach is described, and the different MCDA modeling approaches are applied to a hypothetical case study. Results: A comparison of the different MCDA approaches is provided, and the generic issues that need consideration before the application of MCDA in health technology assessment are examined. Conclusions: There are general practical issues that might arise from using an MCDA approach, and it is suggested that appropriate care be taken to ensure the success of MCDA techniques in the appraisal process.
引用
收藏
页码:1172 / 1181
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   The principles of Health Technology Assessment in laboratory medicine [J].
Liguori, Giorgio ;
Belfiore, Patrizia ;
D'Amora, Maurizio ;
Liguori, Renato ;
Plebani, Mario .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 55 (01) :32-37
[32]   Strengthening and implementing health technology assessment and the decision-making process in the Region of the Americas [J].
Lessa, Fernanda ;
Caccavo, Francisco ;
Curtis, Stephanie ;
Ouimet-Rathe, Stephanie ;
Lemgruber, Alexandre .
REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 41
[33]   Evidence-based decision making and health technology assessment [J].
Oh, Eun-Hwan .
TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 10 (06) :293-295
[34]   Evidence-based decision making and health technology assessment [J].
Eun-Hwan Oh .
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2013, 10 :293-295
[35]   THE IMPACT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORTS ON DECISION MAKING IN AUSTRIA [J].
Zechmeister, Ingrid ;
Schumacher, Ines .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2012, 28 (01) :77-84
[36]   Health Technology Assessment in Oral Health [J].
Esfandiari, Shahrokh ;
Feine, Jocelyne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2011, 26 :93-100
[37]   Progressive methods in multiple criteria decision analysis [J].
Patrick Meyer .
4OR, 2009, 7 :191-194
[38]   Progressive methods in multiple criteria decision analysis [J].
Meyer, Patrick .
4OR-A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2009, 7 (02) :191-194
[39]   Mapping of multiple criteria for priority setting of health interventions: an aid for decision makers [J].
Tromp, Noor ;
Baltussen, Rob .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2012, 12
[40]   An introduction and survey of the evidential reasoning approach for multiple criteria decision analysis [J].
Xu, Dong-Ling .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2012, 195 (01) :163-187