Effects of residual feed intake classification and method of alfalfa processing on ewe intake and growth

被引:12
作者
Redden, R. R. [1 ]
Surber, L. M. M. [2 ]
Grove, A. V. [3 ]
Kott, R. W. [2 ]
机构
[1] N Dakota State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Fargo, ND 58108 USA
[2] Montana State Univ, Dept Anim & Range Sci, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA
[3] AG Res LLC, White Sulphur Springs, MT 59645 USA
关键词
body composition; dry matter intake; growth; hay processing; residual feed intake; sheep; STEERS FED GROWER; BEEF-CATTLE; GENETIC-PARAMETERS; FINISHER DIETS; EFFICIENCY; BEHAVIOR; HEIFERS; TRAITS; LAMBS; SHEEP;
D O I
10.2527/jas.2013-6768
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this research was to evaluate the effects of residual feed intake (RFI) determined under ad libitum feeding conditions on DMI and performance of yearling ewes fed either chopped or pelleted alfalfa hay. In Exp. 1, 45 ewe-lambs had ad libitum access to a pelleted grower diet for 63 d and individual DMI was determined using an electronic feed delivery system. Residual feed intake values were assigned to each ewe-lamb as a measure of feed efficiency. Sixteen ewe-lambs with the most positive RFI values were classified as high RFI (inefficient) and 16 ewe-lambs with the most negative RFI values were classified as low RFI (efficient). In Exp. 2, half of the ewes from each efficiency group were placed into 1 of 2 pens and provided ad libitum access to either pelleted or chopped alfalfa hay. Individual DMI was again determined using an electronic feed delivery system. Body weight, LM area (LMA), and 12th-rib back fat thickness (BF) were measured at the beginning and end of both experiments. In Exp. 1, DMI by ewe-lambs in the low RFI group was 9% less (P = 0.01) than by ewe-lambs in the high RFI group (2.21 vs. 2.43 kg/d); however, ADG and initial and final BW, LMA, and BF did not differ (P > 0.27) among RFI groups. In Exp. 2, there were no feed processing x RFI group interactions (P > 0.14) for any trait. By design, RFI values were lower (P < 0.01) by yearling ewes in the low than high RFI group (-0.27 vs. 0.27); however, RFI values did not differ (P = 1.0) between yearling ewes fed chopped versus pelleted alfalfa. Dry matter intake was 22% less (P < 0.01) by yearling ewes in the low than high RFI group (2.5 vs. 3.2 kg/d) and 59% less (P < 0.01) by yearling ewes fed chopped versus pelleted alfalfa (2.2 vs. 3.5 kg/d). Initial and final BW, ADG, and G: F did not differ (P > 0.45) between RFI groups but were greater (P < 0.01) by yearling ewes fed pelleted alfalfa compared to chopped alfalfa. Final LMA did not differ (P = 0.77) between RFI groups, but final BF tended to be greater (P = 0.06) for high than low RFI yearling ewes (0.63 vs. 0.57 cm). Final LMA and BF were greater (P < 0.01) by yearling ewes fed pelleted than chopped alfalfa. Low RFI ewes had lower DMI and BF compared to high RFI ewes. Ewe efficiency as determined by RFI was repeatable on subsequent forage based diets; however, differences in intake and efficiency were more apparent when alfalfa was pelleted.
引用
收藏
页码:830 / 835
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measuring residual feed intake in dairy heifers fed an alfalfa (Medicago sativa) cube diet
    Waghorn, G. C.
    Macdonald, K. A.
    Williams, Y.
    Davis, S. R.
    Spelman, R. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2012, 95 (03) : 1462 - 1471
  • [22] Effects of ad libitum and restricted feed intake on growth performance and body composition of Yorkshire pigs selected for reduced residual feed intake
    Boddicker, N.
    Gabler, N. K.
    Spurlock, M. E.
    Nettleton, D.
    Dekkers, J. C. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (01) : 40 - 51
  • [23] Validation of the Residual Feed Intake Model in Brangus Heifers: Determination of the Optimal Days on Feed Interval to Estimate Dry Matter Intake and Average Daily Gain
    Mahler, Lauren E.
    Mullenix, Mary Kimberly
    Brandebourg, Terry D.
    Kriese-Anderson, Lisa A.
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (14):
  • [24] Performance, feed efficiency, feeding behavior, and cortisol concentration of lambs ranked for Residual Feed Intake and Residual Intake and Gain
    Sartori, Luiza Vage Coelho
    Gurgeira, Danielle Nunes
    Crisostomo, Charleni
    de Paz, Claudia Cristina Paro
    Ferreira, Josiel
    da Costa, Ricardo Lopes Dias
    [J]. TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2024, 56 (02)
  • [25] Holstein-Friesian calves selected for divergence in residual feed intake during growth exhibited significant but reduced residual feed intake divergence in their first lactation
    Macdonald, K. A.
    Pryce, J. E.
    Spelman, R. J.
    Davis, S. R.
    Wales, W. J.
    Waghorn, G. C.
    Williams, Y. J., II
    Marett, L. C.
    Hayes, B. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2014, 97 (03) : 1427 - 1435
  • [26] Residual feed intake and gain alters the performance and carcass traits in Nellore cattle
    Fernandes, Luis Miguel Goncalves
    de Moraes, Giovanna Faria
    Lopes, Idael Matheus Goes
    Abreu, Luiza Rodrigues Alves
    Chaves, Amalia Saturnino
    [J]. TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2024, 56 (08)
  • [27] Genetic parameters for residual feed intake, methane emissions, and body composition in New Zealand maternal sheep
    Johnson, Patricia L.
    Hickey, Sharon
    Knowler, Kevin
    Wing, Janine
    Bryson, Brooke
    Hall, Melanie
    Jonker, Arjan
    Janssen, Peter H.
    Dodds, Ken G.
    McEwan, John C.
    Rowe, Suzanne J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 13
  • [28] Dissection of Koch's residual feed intake: Implications for selection
    Aggrey, Samuel E.
    Rekaya, Romdhane
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2013, 92 (10) : 2600 - 2605
  • [29] Evidence of residual feed intake reranking in crossbred replacement heifers
    Durunna, O. N.
    Colazo, M. G.
    Ambrose, D. J.
    McCartney, D.
    Baron, V. S.
    Basarab, J. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 90 (03) : 734 - 741
  • [30] Effects of anthelmintic treatment on ewe feed intake, digestion, milk production and lamb growth
    Zhong, R. Z.
    Cheng, L.
    Wang, Y. Q.
    Sun, X. Z.
    Luo, D. W.
    Fang, Y.
    Bush, R. D.
    Zhou, D. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2017, 155 (02) : 326 - 333