A multiple-model generalisation of updating clinical prediction models

被引:12
作者
Martin, Glen P. [1 ]
Mamas, Mamas A. [1 ,2 ]
Peek, Niels [1 ,3 ]
Buchan, Iain [1 ,4 ]
Sperrin, Matthew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Farr Inst, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Keele Univ, Keele Cardiovasc Res Grp, Stoke On Trent, Staffs, England
[3] Univ Manchester, NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safe, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Microsoft Res, Cambridge, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
clinical prediction models; logistic regression; model aggregation; model updating; stacked regression; validation; INDIVIDUAL PARTICIPANT DATA; AORTIC-VALVE IMPLANTATION; DATA METAANALYSIS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; TRANSCATHETER; MORTALITY; VALIDATION; REGRESSION; REPLACEMENT; SCORE;
D O I
10.1002/sim.7586
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
There is growing interest in developing clinical prediction models (CPMs) to aid local healthcare decision-making. Frequently, these CPMs are developed in isolation across different populations, with repetitive de novo derivation a common modelling strategy. However, this fails to utilise all available information and does not respond to changes in health processes through time and space. Alternatively, model updating techniques have previously been proposed that adjust an existing CPM to suit the new population, but these techniques are restricted to a single model. Therefore, we aimed to develop a generalised method for updating and aggregating multiple CPMs. The proposed hybrid method re-calibrates multiple CPMs using stacked regression while concurrently revising specific covariates using individual participant data (IPD) under a penalised likelihood. The performance of the hybrid method was compared with existing methods in a clinical example of mortality risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve implantation, and in 2 simulation studies. The simulation studies explored the effect of sample size and between-population-heterogeneity on the method, with each representing a situation of having multiple distinct CPMs and 1 set of IPD. When the sample size of the IPD was small, stacked regression and the hybrid method had comparable but highest performance across modelling methods. Conversely, in large IPD samples, development of a new model and the hybrid method gave the highest performance. Hence, the proposed strategy can inform the choice between utilising existing CPMs or developing a model de novo, thereby incorporating IPD, existing research, and prior (clinical) knowledge into the modelling strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:1343 / 1358
页数:16
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Developing and validating risk prediction models in an individual participant data meta-analysis [J].
Ahmed, Ikhlaaq ;
Debray, Thomas P. A. ;
Moons, Karel G. M. ;
Riley, Richard D. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14
[2]   Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model [J].
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Vergouwe, Yvonne ;
Royston, Patrick ;
Moons, Karel G. M. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 :1432-1435
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[4]   Events per variable (EPV) and the relative performance of different strategies for estimating the out-of-sample validity of logistic regression models [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (02) :796-808
[5]  
Breiman L, 1996, MACH LEARN, V24, P49
[6]   A Simple Risk Tool (the OBSERVANT Score) for Prediction of 30-Day Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement [J].
Capodanno, Davide ;
Barbanti, Marco ;
Tamburino, Corrado ;
D'Errigo, Paola ;
Ranucci, Marco ;
Santoro, Gennaro ;
Santini, Francesco ;
Onorati, Francesco ;
Grossi, Claudio ;
Covello, Remo Daniel ;
Capranzano, Piera ;
Rosato, Stefano ;
Seccareccia, Fulvia .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 113 (11) :1851-1858
[7]  
COX DR, 1958, BIOMETRIKA, V45, P562, DOI 10.1093/biomet/45.3-4.562
[8]   Meta-analysis and aggregation of multiple published prediction models [J].
Debray, Thomas P. A. ;
Koffijberg, Hendrik ;
Nieboer, Daan ;
Vergouwe, Yvonne ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Moons, Karel G. M. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (14) :2341-2362
[9]   A framework for developing, implementing, and evaluating clinical prediction models in an individual participant data meta-analysis [J].
Debray, Thomas P. A. ;
Moons, Karel G. M. ;
Ahmed, Ikhlaaq ;
Koffijberg, Hendrik ;
Riley, Richard David .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (18) :3158-3180
[10]   Aggregating published prediction models with individual participant data: a comparison of different approaches [J].
Debray, Thomas P. A. ;
Koffijberg, Hendrik ;
Vergouwe, Yvonne ;
Moons, Karel G. M. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 31 (23) :2697-2712