Facilitating healthy dietary habits: An experiment with a low income population

被引:9
作者
Belot, Michele [1 ,2 ,3 ]
James, Jonathan [4 ]
Spiteri, Jonathan [5 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] European Univ Inst, Fiesole, Italy
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Bath, Dept Econ, Bath, Avon, England
[5] Univ Malta, Dept Econ, Msida, Malta
关键词
Health risks; Dietary habits; Bounded rationality; Heuristics; Information; Time availability; Laboratory experiments; RISK PERCEPTIONS; TIME PRESSURE; CHOICES; INFORMATION; PSYCHOLOGY; INFERENCE; BEHAVIOR; DISEASE; POVERTY; LEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103550
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper tests an intervention aimed at facilitating (cognitively) the adoption of healthy dietary habits. We provide easy-to-understand information about the risks of developing diabetes or heart diseases and give easy-to-follow dietary recommendations to minimize these risks. We implement two variations, one consisting of generic information, the other consisting of information tailored to the individual, the latter resembling newly developed online health assessment tools. On top of the information treatment, we implement a second experimental variation encouraging people to spend more time thinking about their decisions. We find evidence that the information intervention leads to healthier choices in the short run, but mostly in the generic treatment. Surprisingly, we find that people are on average pessimistic about their health, and therefore receive good news on average when the information is tailored to them. We find no evidence that increasing the time available to make choices leads to healthier choices, and find no evidence of long-term changes in habits. These results do not support a bounded rationality explanation for poor dietary choices. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 53 条
[41]   CHANGE OF PREFERENCES UNDER TIME PRESSURE - CHOICES AND JUDGEMENTS [J].
SVENSON, O ;
EDLAND, A .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 28 (04) :322-330
[42]   Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints [J].
van Herpen, Erica ;
van Trijp, Hans C. M. .
APPETITE, 2011, 57 (01) :148-160
[43]  
Verplanken B., 1999, Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol., V10, P101, DOI [10.1080/14792779943000035, DOI 10.1080/14792779943000035]
[44]  
Villeval M., 2020, GLO DISCUSSION PAPER, V482
[45]   Risk beliefs and smoking behavior [J].
Viscusi, W. Kip ;
Hakes, Jahn K. .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2008, 46 (01) :45-59
[46]   DO SMOKERS UNDERESTIMATE RISKS [J].
VISCUSI, WK .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1990, 98 (06) :1253-1269
[47]   A BAYESIAN PERSPECTIVE ON BIASES IN RISK PERCEPTION [J].
VISCUSI, WK .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1985, 17 (1-2) :59-62
[48]   DO THEY KNOW WHAT IS AT RISK? HEALTH RISK PERCEPTION AMONG THE OBESE [J].
Winter, Joachim ;
Wuppermann, Amelie .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2014, 23 (05) :564-585
[49]   Promoting Healthy Choices: Information versus Convenience [J].
Wisdom, Jessica ;
Downs, Julie S. ;
Loewenstein, George .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2010, 2 (02) :164-178
[50]  
Wood W., 2016, Behavioral Science Policy, V2, P71, DOI [DOI 10.1353/BSP.2016.0008, 10.1353/bsp.2016.0008]