Differentiating winners: How elections affect satisfaction with democracy

被引:147
作者
Singh, Shane [1 ]
Karakoc, Ekrem [2 ]
Blais, Andre [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Int Affairs, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Montreal, Canada Res Chair Electoral Studies, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
关键词
Satisfaction with democracy; Regional elections; Germany; Political attitudes; REPRESENTATION; INSTITUTIONS; ATTITUDES; CHOICE; VOTE; DETERMINANTS; PERCEPTIONS; GOVERNMENT; ECONOMICS; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.electstud.2011.11.001
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Previous research indicates that supporting a winning party in an election boosts satisfaction with democracy, but does not fully or adequately test the mechanisms behind this relationship. Using original survey data, we make a contribution on three fronts. First, we inquire what winning (or losing) an election really means in terms of the performance of one's preferred party. Second, we employ panel data, which helps to determine whether an election outcome truly impacts satisfaction levels. Third, we examine the breadth of electoral victory, testing whether the satisfaction boost from a regional victory extends to the national and supranational levels. Findings indicate that the inclusion of one's selected party in government is the most important factor for satisfaction with democracy, which attests to the importance of policy considerations in engendering satisfaction. In addition, winning a regional election strengthens satisfaction beyond the regional level, which indicates that the mere experience of being a "winner" also works to increase satisfaction. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 211
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   THE DECLINE OF ELECTORAL-PARTICIPATION IN AMERICA [J].
ABRAMSON, PR ;
ALDRICH, JH .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1982, 76 (03) :502-521
[2]  
Almond G., 1963, CIVIC CULT
[3]   Economics, entitlements, and social issues: Voter choice in the 1996 presidential election [J].
Alvarez, RM ;
Nagler, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 42 (04) :1349-1363
[4]   Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems [J].
Anderson, CJ ;
Guillory, CA .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1997, 91 (01) :66-81
[5]   Endogenous economic voting: evidence from the 1997 British election [J].
Anderson, CJ ;
Mendes, SM ;
Tverdova, YV .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2004, 23 (04) :683-708
[6]   Winning, losing and political trust in America [J].
Anderson, CJ ;
LoTempio, AJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 32 :335-351
[7]  
ANDERSON CJ, 2001, INT POLITICAL SCI RE, V0022
[8]  
Anderson CJ., 2005, LOSERS CONSENT ELECT
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2008, CITIZEN POLITICS PUB
[10]   How elections change the way citizens view the political system: Campaigns, media effects and electoral outcomes in comparative perspective [J].
Banducci, SA ;
Karp, JA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 33 :443-467