Defining Success in Adult Basic Education Settings: Multiple Stakeholders, Multiple Perspectives

被引:11
作者
Tighe, Elizabeth L. [1 ]
Barnes, Adrienne E. [2 ]
Connor, Carol M. [3 ]
Steadman, Sharilyn C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Cognit Psychol Dept, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Florida State Univ, Coll Educ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Interdisciplinary Learning Sci Inst, Phoenix, AZ USA
[4] E Carolina Univ, Coll Educ, Greenville, NC USA
关键词
Motivation/engagement; Persistence; Research methodology; Ethnography; Mixed methods; Strategies; methods; and materials; Instructional strategies; teaching strategies; Struggling learners; To learners in which of the following categories does your work apply; Adult; SCHOOL; INSTRUCTION; CLASSROOMS;
D O I
10.1002/rrq.57
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study employed quantitative and qualitative research approaches to investigate what constitutes success in adult basic education (ABE) programs from the perspectives of multiple educational stakeholders: the state funding agency, the teachers, and the students. Success was defined in multiple ways. In the quantitative section of the study, we computed classroom value-added scores (used as a metric of the state's definition of success) to identify more and less effective ABE classrooms in two Florida counties. In the qualitative section of the study, we observed and conducted interviews with teachers and students in the selected classrooms to investigate how these stakeholders defined success in ABE. Iterative consideration of the qualitative data revealed three principal markers of success: (1) instructional strategies and teacher-student interactions, (2) views on standardized testing, and (3) student motivational factors. In general, classrooms with higher value-added scores were characterized by multiple instructional approaches, positive and collaborative teacher-student interactions, and students engaging in goal setting and citing motivational factors such as family and personal fulfillment. The implications for ABE programs are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 435
页数:21
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Anderson-Levitt KM, 2006, HANDBOOK OF COMPLEMENTARY METHODS IN EDUCATION RESEARCH, P279
  • [2] [Anonymous], DEFINING IMPROVING Q
  • [3] [Anonymous], 93275 NCES US DEP ED
  • [4] Controlling for student background in value-added assessment of teachers
    Ballou, D
    Sanders, W
    Wright, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2004, 29 (01) : 37 - 65
  • [5] Barton D, 2013, LITERACY AND NUMERACY IN LATIN AMERICA: LOCAL PERSPECTIVES AND BEYOND, P214
  • [6] BELZER A, 2007, DEFINING IMPROVING Q, pR9
  • [7] Bennett P., 2007, Review of adult learning and literacy, V7, pvii
  • [8] The first days of school in the classrooms of two more effective and four less effective primary-grades teachers
    Bohn, CM
    Roehrig, AD
    Pressley, M
    [J]. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL, 2004, 104 (04) : 269 - 287
  • [9] MEASURING ACHIEVEMENT GAINS IN THE CHICAGO PUBLIC-SCHOOLS
    BRYK, AS
    DEABSTER, PE
    EASTON, JQ
    LUPPESCU, S
    THUM, YM
    [J]. EDUCATION AND URBAN SOCIETY, 1994, 26 (03) : 306 - 319
  • [10] Coates J., 1996, WOMEN TALK CONVERSAT