Analytical and experimental position stability of the abutment in different dental implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection

被引:22
作者
Semper-Hogg, Wiebke [1 ]
Kraft, Silvan [2 ]
Stiller, Sebastian [1 ]
Mehrhof, Juergen [3 ]
Nelson, Katja [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Freiburg, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Radiol, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[3] Zahntech Mehrhof GmbH, D-10553 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Rotational freedom; Vertical displacement; Conical; Positional index; Hexagon; Cam-groove design; MARGINAL FIT; EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; PROSTHESES; CONFIGURATION; COMPLICATIONS; RESTORATIONS; INTERFACE; ROTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-012-0786-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Position stability of the abutment should be investigated in four implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection. Previously developed formulas and an established experimental setup were used to determine the position stability of the abutment in the four implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection and different positional index designs: The theoretical rotational freedom was calculated by using the dimensions of one randomly selected implant per system for approximated geometric models. Experimentally, the rotation, the vertical displacement, and canting moments of the abutment after multiple repositioning and hand tightening of the abutment screw were investigated. The experimental rotation and vertical displacement differed between the implant systems tested. The analytical and experimental results for the rotation of the abutment clearly deviated in the three implant systems. Malpositioning of the abutment was possible in all the implant systems tested. Deviating theoretical and experimental results suggest high manufacturing tolerances during fabrication of the implant components. Position stability of the abutment is essential for precisely fitting implant-supported superstructures.
引用
收藏
页码:1017 / 1023
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Barbosa Gustavo Augusto Seabra, 2010, Braz. Dent. J., V21, P515, DOI 10.1590/S0103-64402010000600006
[2]  
Binon PP, 1996, INT J PROSTHODONT, V9, P149
[3]  
Bozini T, 2011, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V26, P304
[4]  
Brunner E., 2002, Nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments
[5]  
Carrilho GPD, 2005, INT J PROSTHODONT, V18, P165
[6]  
Dailey B, 2009, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V24, P251
[7]  
Davis DM, 2003, INT J PROSTHODONT, V16, P521
[8]  
Gallucci GO, 2005, INT J PERIODONT REST, V25, P27
[9]  
Goheen K L, 1994, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V9, P149
[10]   Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses [J].
Goodacre, CJ ;
Bernal, G ;
Rungcharassaeng, K ;
Kan, JYK .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 90 (02) :121-132