Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study

被引:88
|
作者
Kim, Chi Heon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chung, Chun Kee [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Park, Choon Seon [4 ]
Choi, Boram [4 ]
Hahn, Seokyung [5 ,6 ]
Kim, Min Jung [6 ]
Lee, Kun Sei [4 ,7 ]
Park, Byung Joo [6 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Med Res Ctr, Neurosci Res Inst, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Clin Res Inst, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[4] Hlth Insurance Review & Assessment Serv, Seoul 137706, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Med Res Collaborating Ctr, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[7] KonKuk Univ, Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Seoul 143701, South Korea
[8] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Seoul 110744, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Reoperation rate; Decompression; Fusion; Lumbar spine; Surgery; NONSURGICAL MANAGEMENT; FUSION SURGERY; OUTCOMES; OPERATIONS; DECOMPRESSION; POPULATION; HERNIATION; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.069
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the most common degenerative spine diseases. Surgical options are largely divided into decompression only and decompression with arthrodesis. Recent randomized trials showed that surgery was more effective than nonoperative treatment for carefully selected patients with lumbar stenosis. However, some patients require reoperation because of complications, failure of bony fusion, persistent pain, or progressive degenerative changes, such as adjacent segment disease. In a previous population-based study, the 10-year reoperation rate was 17%, and fusion surgery was performed in 10% of patients. Recently, the lumbar fusion surgery rate has doubled, and a substantial portion of the reoperations are associated with a fusion procedure. With the change in surgical trends, the longitudinal surgical outcomes of these trends need to be reevaluated. PURPOSE: To provide the longitudinal reoperation rate after surgery for spinal stenosis and to compare the reoperation rates between decompression and fusion surgeries. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study using national health insurance data. PATIENT SAMPLE: A cohort of patients who underwent initial surgery for lumbar stenosis without spondylolisthesis in 2003. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was any type of second lumbar surgery. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to compare the adjusted reoperation rates between decompression and fusion surgeries. METHODS: A national health insurance database was used to identify a cohort of patients who underwent an initial surgery for lumbar stenosis without spondylolisthesis in 2003; a total of 11,027 patients were selected. Individual patients were followed for at least 5 years through their encrypted unique resident registration number. After adjusting for confounding factors, the reoperation rates for decompression and fusion surgery were compared. RESULTS: Fusion surgery was performed in 20% of patients. The cumulative reoperation rate was 4.7% at 3 months, 7.2% at 1 year, 9.4% at 2 years, 11.2% at 3 years, 12.5% at 4 years, and 14.2% at 5 years. The adjusted reoperation rate was not different between decompression and fusion surgeries (p=.82). The calculated reoperation rate was expected to be 22.9% at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: The reoperation rate was not different between decompression and fusion surgeries. With current surgical trends, the reoperation rate appeared to be higher than in the past, and consideration of this problem is required. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1230 / 1237
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The relationship between diabetes and the reoperation rate after lumbar spinal surgery: a nationwide cohort study
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Chung, Chun Kee
    Shin, Sukyoun
    Choi, Bo Ram
    Kim, Min Jung
    Park, Byung Joo
    Choi, Yunhee
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (05) : 866 - 874
  • [2] Reoperation Rate After Surgery for Lumbar Herniated Intervertebral Disc Disease Nationwide Cohort Study
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Chung, Chun Kee
    Park, Choon Seon
    Choi, Boram
    Kim, Min Jung
    Park, Byung Joo
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (07) : 581 - 590
  • [3] Reoperation Rate After Microsurgical Uni- or Bilateral Laminotomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With and Without Low-grade Spondylolisthesis What do Preoperative Radiographic Parameters Tell Us?
    Schar, Ralph T.
    Kiebach, Stefanie
    Raabe, Andreas
    Ulrich, Christian T.
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (04) : E245 - E251
  • [4] Comparison of Patients Operated for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With and Without Spondylolisthesis
    Weber, Clemens
    Hermansen, Erland
    Myklebust, Tor Age
    Banitalebi, Hasan
    Brisby, Helena
    Brox, Jens I.
    Franssen, Eric
    Hellum, Christian
    Indrekvam, Kari
    Harboe, Knut
    Rekeland, Frode
    Solberg, Tore
    Storheim, Kjersti
    Austevoll, Ivar M.
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (19) : 1332 - 1338
  • [5] Lumbar Decompression With and Without Fusion for Lumbar Stenosis With Spondylolisthesis
    Sastry, Rahul A.
    Levy, Joseph F.
    Chen, Jia-Shu
    Weil, Robert J.
    Oyelese, Adetokunbo A.
    Fridley, Jared S.
    Gokaslan, Ziya L.
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (12) : 847 - 856
  • [6] Microendoscopic discectomy versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis
    Yi, Weihong
    Tang, Yu
    Yang, Dazhi
    Huang, Wenhua
    Liu, Huan
    Sun, Ziqi
    Yao, Yuan
    Zhou, Yue
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (24) : E20743
  • [7] Predictors for failure after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational study
    Alhaug, Ole Kristian
    Dolatowski, Filip C.
    Solberg, Tore K.
    Lonne, Greger
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (02) : 261 - 270
  • [8] Reoperations After Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Javalkar, Vijayakumar
    Cardenas, Raul
    Tawfik, Tamir A.
    Khan, Imtiaz R.
    Bollam, Papireddy
    Banerjee, Anirban Deep
    Nanda, Anil
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 75 (5-6) : 737 - 742
  • [9] The outcome of decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Ahmad, Sarfraz
    Hamad, Abdulkader
    Bhalla, Amit
    Turner, Sarah
    Balain, Birender
    Jaffray, David
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (02) : 414 - 419
  • [10] Risk factors for 90-day reoperation and readmission after lumbar surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Ilyas, Haariss
    Golubovsky, Joshua L.
    Chen, Jingxiao
    Winkelman, Robert D.
    Mroz, Thomas E.
    Steinmetz, Michael P.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 31 (01) : 20 - 26