Comparison of CT Angiography With MR Angiography in the Preoperative Assessment of Living Kidney Donors

被引:44
作者
Gluecker, Thomas M. [1 ]
Mayr, Michael
schwarz, Jochen [1 ]
Bilecen, Deniz [1 ]
Voegele, Thomas
Steiger, Juerg
Bachmann, Alexander [2 ]
Bongartz, Georg [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, CH-4051 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Urol, CH-4051 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Renal transplantation; MRI; Computer tomography;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e3181890810
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. The aim of the Study was to prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of CT angiography (CTA) with MR angiography (MRA) in the preoperative assessment of living renal donors. Methods. Forty-eight potential living renal donors (mean 51 years, 29-67 years) underwent multislice CTA and gadolinium-enhanced MRA. Six potential donors were excluded. Forty-two donors underwent minimal invasive retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy (left 36, right 6) and their datasets available for analysis independently performed by two blinded radiologists. The surgical status served as gold standard. Results. In 42 donors (84 kidneys), CTA identified 63 kidneys with I artery (MRI 61), 19 with 2 arteries (MRI 20), one with three arteries (MRI 2), and one with four arteries (MRI 1). Considering only the side with the surgical status available for verification, both CT and MRI correctly characterized 35 of 36 donors with a single renal artery and five of six with one supernumerary artery. Two false positives were two arteries suggested as supernumerary both in CT and MRI not confirmed during surgery. CTA and MRA both correctly identified three accessory renal veins in two donors. Conclusion. CTA and MRA had the same accuracy for characterization of renal vasculature in the preoperative assessment of living renal donors.
引用
收藏
页码:1249 / 1256
页数:8
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] ALFREY EJ, 1995, TRANSPLANTATION, V59, P643
  • [2] Pre-donation assessment of kidneys by magnetic resonance angiography and venography: Accuracy and impact on outcomes
    Ames, SA
    Krol, M
    Nettar, K
    Goldman, JP
    Quinn, TM
    Herron, DM
    Pomp, A
    Bromberg, JS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (06) : 1518 - 1528
  • [3] Postoperative pain and convalescence in living kidney donors-laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: A randomized study
    Andersen, MH
    Mathisen, L
    Oyen, O
    Edwin, B
    Digernes, R
    Kvarstein, G
    Tonnessen, TI
    Wahl, AK
    Hanestad, BR
    Fosse, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (06) : 1438 - 1443
  • [4] Pre-emptive kidney transplantation: the attractive alternative
    Asderakis, A
    Augustine, T
    Dyer, P
    Short, C
    Campbell, B
    Parrott, NR
    Johnson, RWG
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 13 (07) : 1799 - 1803
  • [5] Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy:: A retrospective, non-randomized comparison of early complications, donor and recipient outcome with the standard open approach
    Bachmann, A
    Wolff, T
    Ruszat, R
    Giannini, O
    Dickenmann, M
    Gürke, L
    Steiger, J
    Gasser, TC
    Stief, CG
    Sulser, T
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 48 (01) : 90 - 96
  • [6] How painful is donor nephrectomy?: Retrospective analysis of early pain and pain management in open versus laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy
    Bachmann, Alexander
    Wolff, Thomas
    Giannini, Olivier
    Dickenman, Michael
    Ruszat, Robin
    Guerke, Lorenz
    Kaufmann, Mark
    Gasser, Thomas C.
    Steiger, Juerg
    Stief, Christian G.
    Sulser, Tullio
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 81 (12) : 1735 - 1738
  • [7] Editorial: Living donor nephrectomy
    Barry, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (01) : 61 - 62
  • [8] Prospective study comparing three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the renal vascular anatomy in potential living renal donors
    Bhatti, AA
    Chugtai, A
    Haslam, P
    Talbot, D
    Rix, DA
    Soomro, NA
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (07) : 1105 - 1108
  • [9] CECKA JM, 2003, CLIN TRANSPLANT 2002
  • [10] CECKA JM, 1997, CLIN TRANSPLANT, V1