Validity and Repeatability of Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements With Pentacam and Orbscan

被引:114
作者
Lackner, Birgit [1 ]
Schmidinger, Gerald [1 ]
Skorpik, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Ophthalmol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
anterior chamber depth; biometry; Scheimpflug imaging; comparative study; observer variability;
D O I
10.1097/01.opx.0000177804.53192.15
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and repeatability of anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements obtained with a novel rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam; Oculus Optikgerate GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) to scanning slit topography (Orbscan; Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY). Methods. ACD in 60 healthy eyes was measured twice by two independent observers with each modality in random order. A total of eight measurements was performed on each eye. The mean differences between measurements, between observers, and between modalities were calculated, and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were given as mean +/- 1.96 * standard deviation (SD) of the mean. Results. The mean ACD values as determined with the different modalities (=/- SD) were 3.18 +/- 0.38 mm for Pentacam imaging and 3.23 +/- 0.40 for Orbscan. The mean difference between the two modalities was 0.047 mm (LoA: 0.176 to -0.081 mm). Within each modality, the limits of agreement of the differences between individual measurements and between different observers were within 0.073 mm or 4% of total ACD. The total variance in the observed data was 0.145. The variance resulting from interindividual differences in ACD was 85%, as a result of the two different modalities 15%, as a result of different observers 0.007%, and as a result of different measurements 0.007%. Conclusions. In the assessment of normal eyes, the differences of ACD values measured with Orbscan and Pentacam were within clinically acceptable levels, and inter-and intraobserver variability was considerably below clinically significant levels. Thus, these two modalities can be regarded as interchangeable.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 861
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Allouch C, 2001, J FR OPHTALMOL, V24, P710
[2]   Measuring anterior chamber depth with the Orbscan Topography System [J].
Auffarth, GU ;
Tetz, MR ;
Biazid, Y ;
Volcker, HE .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 23 (09) :1351-1355
[3]   Measuring agreement in method comparison studies [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) :135-160
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]   Accuracy of Orbscan optical pachymetry in corneas with haze [J].
Boscia, F ;
La Tegola, MG ;
Alessio, G ;
Sborgia, C .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (02) :253-258
[6]   COMPARISON OF A-SCAN DEVICE ACCURACY [J].
GIERS, U ;
EPPLE, C .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1990, 16 (02) :235-242
[7]  
Hecht E., 1987, OPTICS
[8]   Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry, and intraocular lens power calculations [J].
Holladay, JT .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 23 (09) :1356-1370
[9]   Anterior chamber depth measurement: A-scan versus optical methods [J].
Koranyi, G ;
Lydahl, E ;
Norrby, S ;
Taube, M .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (02) :243-247
[10]   Multicenter biometry study of 1 pair of eyes [J].
Norrby, S .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 27 (10) :1656-1661